I found that if I don't set the non-scoring subrule to zero, it does the DNS
lookup anyway. I will try that meta. Thx.
Warren
On Sat, 2010-12-25 at 09:04 -0600, Jack L. Stone wrote:
> At 09:07 AM 12.24.2010 -0600, Jack L. Stone wrote:
> Guess I'm the only one with this issue or was it an ignorant question?
Guess you're a little bit impatient, bumping your question after 24
hours, given the date and it being holiday seas
On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 10:08 -1000, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
> score __RCVD_IN_NJABL 0
That's a non-scoring sub-rule, explicitly setting the score to zero does
not change much...
If instead you want to completely get rid of the (stock) eval rule and
the DNS query, I guess changing the ru
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6525
Discussion about disabling NJABL.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6526
Discussion about disabling rfc-ignorant.org.
score __RCVD_IN_NJABL 0
score RCVD_IN_NJABL_CGI 0
score RCVD_IN_NJABL_MULTI
Spamhaus's XBL incorporates the CBL anfd NJABL. The return code is what you
would get from querying the XBL if the IP is on the NJABL.
If there are problems with the NJABL, spamhaus might have some answers.
If it's dead/useless it makes sense to me to not query it.
