On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 02:51:56 -0500, Matt Kettler mkettler...@verizon.net
wrote:
On 1/28/2011 5:28 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 17:00:02 -0500, Adam Moffett
adamli...@plexicomm.net
wrote:
Is there any particular reason there can't be a reply-to: header added
by the
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 17:00:02 -0500, Adam Moffett
adamli...@plexicomm.net
wrote:
Is there any particular reason there can't be a reply-to: header added
by the listserv?
On 1/28/2011 5:28 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
no its a mua problem to use list-post header when replying
On Mon,
Makes you wonder how many servers actually accept these messages these
days!!!
Jan 31 13:46:56 gate sendmail[28364]: p0VCkkxF028364[1]: Milter add:
header: X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=70.8 required=5.0
Am 31.01.2011 14:33, schrieb Giles Coochey:
Makes you wonder how many servers actually accept these messages these
days!!!
all spam traps?
no thunderbird need a plugin to do this
However, the original poster (adfam moffett) uses thunderbird 3.1.7 too, so
he can have the list-reply function
Yes I have a reply list button, but this is the only list I'm on where
I have to use it. I have gotten into the habit of just hitting
Yes I have a reply list button, but this is the only list I'm on where
I have to use it. I have gotten into the habit of just hitting
reply. So I sometimes accidentally reply to the poster instead of the
list.
FWIW, Opera's excellent mail client sets Reply to list as the default
action
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 15:22 +, Anthony Cartmell wrote:
Yes I have a reply list button, but this is the only list I'm on where
I have to use it. I have gotten into the habit of just hitting
reply. So I sometimes accidentally reply to the poster instead of the
list.
FWIW,
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 09:28:27 -0500, Adam Moffett adamli...@plexicomm.net
wrote:
People can believe I'm dumb for thinking that adding/modifying the
reply-to: header is a simpler and cleaner solution, and I can believe
people are dumb for thinking there should be multiple reply buttons in
