SA's logging via Milter to include IP

2011-02-07 Thread Forrest Aldrich
I'd like to change the way SA/Milter reports a rejected message. Namely, to include the IP address that was rejected in the Milter rejection line. This will make it much easier to parse with scripting. Otherwise, you have to parse for the Milter reject, grab the (Sendmail, in my case) queue

Re: Need Volunteers for Ham Trap

2011-02-07 Thread Mahmoud Khonji
On 01/21/2011 01:06 AM, Warren Togami Jr. wrote: > On 1/20/2011 7:23 AM, R - elists wrote: > >> initially this came across as a really suspect idea... >> >> i.e., one man's junk is another man's treasure > > Ham is a lot easier to define than Spam. Ham is simply anything that > you subscribed fo

Re: FYI: IPv6 Update: IANA IPv4 Exhaustion, World IPv6 Day

2011-02-07 Thread Michael Scheidell
On 2/6/11 9:37 PM, Gary V wrote: so I went with a /28, Sorry about that... I liked my Viper and original 300 (not the newer ones that look like a Mercedes.. if I wanted a car that looked like a Mercedes, I would have bought one). Plymouth voyager, all great cars. LOVE that 10 cylinder engin

Re: Irony

2011-02-07 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:49:36 -0500 > Michael Scheidell wrote: > > > because HELO doesn't match RDNS. On 01.02.11 09:54, David F. Skoll wrote: > Rejecting on that basis would also cause tons of false-positives. It's also violation of all SMTP RFCs (former and current), because they explicitly s

Re: List Policy Question: Why no reply-to: header?

2011-02-07 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 31.01.11 09:28, Adam Moffett wrote: > Yes I have a "reply list" button, but this is the only list I'm on where > I have to use it. I have gotten into the habit of just hitting "reply". > So I sometimes accidentally reply to the poster instead of the list. > > It's annoying to me, but it sou