Re: whitelist ip in trusted network

2011-05-06 Thread John Hardin
On Sat, 7 May 2011, Rajesh M wrote: could you please let me how i can whitelist specific servers belonging to my clients from whom i have to receive email perfectly without ever being treated as spam The best way is to tell whatever calls SA that mail from that IP address shouldn't be given

Re: How to get a fresh start in messy old setup

2011-05-06 Thread jidanni
All I know is I first run mail through procmail to filter out the big items before they get to spamassassin. Never enabled Bayes and don't intend to. Hmm, I seem to have described it in http://jidanni.org/comp/spam/spamdealer.html

Re: whitelist ip in trusted network

2011-05-06 Thread Joe Sniderman
On 05/06/2011 08:38 PM, Rajesh M wrote: > hi > > i wish to whitelist a few client's server's static ip in the spamassasin > trusted network > > i am entering a line like this in local.cf file. > > trusted_networks xxx.yyy.zzz.ppp > > if i do this then the email from this server ip should be giv

Re: whitelist ip in trusted network

2011-05-06 Thread Rajesh M
> On 05/07, Rajesh M wrote: >> trusted_networks xxx.yyy.zzz.ppp >> >> if i do this then the email from this server ip should be given a >> negative >> score but it does not seem to work > > That's not what trusted_networks does. It skips the Received header from > those IPs for things like DNS bla

Re: whitelist ip in trusted network

2011-05-06 Thread darxus
On 05/07, Rajesh M wrote: > trusted_networks xxx.yyy.zzz.ppp > > if i do this then the email from this server ip should be given a negative > score but it does not seem to work That's not what trusted_networks does. It skips the Received header from those IPs for things like DNS blacklist lookup

whitelist ip in trusted network

2011-05-06 Thread Rajesh M
hi i wish to whitelist a few client's server's static ip in the spamassasin trusted network i am entering a line like this in local.cf file. trusted_networks xxx.yyy.zzz.ppp if i do this then the email from this server ip should be given a negative score but it does not seem to work spamassass

FW: Dumb questions

2011-05-06 Thread Greg Lentz
Hmmm, let's try to "make clean" that last e-mail. That got sent out a little too early. > -Original Message- > From: dar...@chaosreigns.com [mailto:dar...@chaosreigns.com] > Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 12:42 PM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: Dumb questions > > > I don'

RE: Dumb questions

2011-05-06 Thread Greg Lentz
-- Greg > -Original Message- > From: dar...@chaosreigns.com [mailto:dar...@chaosreigns.com] > Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 12:42 PM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: Dumb questions > > On 05/06, Greg Lentz wrote: > > Backups of what? I would probably just make copies of

RE: Dumb questions

2011-05-06 Thread Greg Lentz
Because if version 3.2 of SpamAssassin isn't updating rules, then knowing where the rules are isn't as of great an immediate interest to me. I may be asking dumb questions, but I do know that I want the rules to be up to date. -- Greg Lentz > -Original Message- > From: Warren Togami Jr.

Re: Dumb questions

2011-05-06 Thread jdow
Does 99.9% sound good, Warren? A well trained BAYES and a good selection of rules helps a lot. {o.o} On 2011/05/06 13:46, Warren Togami Jr. wrote: On 5/6/2011 9:19 AM, Greg Lentz wrote: Well, since it looks like SA 3.2 hasn't been getting rules for a couple of years, that probably isn't as cri

Re: Dumb questions

2011-05-06 Thread Warren Togami Jr.
On 5/6/2011 9:19 AM, Greg Lentz wrote: Well, since it looks like SA 3.2 hasn't been getting rules for a couple of years, that probably isn't as critical at the moment. -- Greg Lentz Of course it is critical. How effective would your virus scanner be after several years without updates? Warren

Re: Dumb questions

2011-05-06 Thread darxus
On 05/06, Greg Lentz wrote: > Backups of what? I would probably just make copies of the whatever > directories I was going to upgrade over in case I failed miserably. Everything. You don't know where the stuff you're currently using is. Backups are good. > > > >1. How can I determin

RE: Dumb questions

2011-05-06 Thread Greg Lentz
> -Original Message- > From: dar...@chaosreigns.com [mailto:dar...@chaosreigns.com] > Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 11:48 AM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: Dumb questions > > On 05/06, Greg Lentz wrote: > >We are currently running SpamAssassin 3.2.4 on Mac OS 10.4.11 w

Re: Dumb questions

2011-05-06 Thread darxus
On 05/06, Greg Lentz wrote: >We are currently running SpamAssassin 3.2.4 on Mac OS 10.4.11 with a third Yup, upgrading to 3.3.1 would be good. "Rule updates for 3.2.x effectively stopped late 2008." Start by making sure you have good backups. >1.   How can I determine where the runn

Dumb questions

2011-05-06 Thread Greg Lentz
I apologize in advance if I seem a bit dim for this list - however it seemed the best place to get answers on how to maintain the out of date SpamAssassin install I have. We are currently running SpamAssassin 3.2.4 on Mac OS 10.4.11 with a third party helper program that has been out of support