On 7/26/11 8:41 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
Did the message genuinely come from Dell? The named $director entity? Or
was it an ESP on behalf of Dell?
noop, dell directly, with a DNSWL_MED credit on the email with the
default rules SA has for DNSWL.I did reply back and tell the user that
Hi, registered just to post this, in hope that it'll be of help for some
other users. This pertains boxes with Plesk + SpamAssassin.
Recently my server has been hit hard with job offer spam, and upon
investigation, I realized that the messages in question (which are
always self-addressed in
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 18:13:25 +0100, Bruno Ferreira - Digitalmente Lda.
wrote:
Hi, registered just to post this, in hope that it'll be of help for
some other users. This pertains boxes with Plesk + SpamAssassin.
http://old.nabble.com/postfwd-stop-equal-sender-recipient-spams-td21164908.html
On 7/26/11 8:41 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
Did the message genuinely come from Dell? The named $director
entity? Or was it an ESP on behalf of Dell?
On 07/27/2011 07:13 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
noop, dell directly, with a DNSWL_MED credit on the email with the
default rules SA has
On 07/27, Bruno Ferreira - Digitalmente Lda. wrote:
always self-addressed in some form or other) are actually being
delivered without any SA headers after all. However, the logs (the
Is it possible plesk is set up to only add the SA headers above some
specified SA threshold? Amavis has a
On 07/27/2011 10:32 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 18:13:25 +0100, Bruno Ferreira - Digitalmente Lda.
wrote:
Hi, registered just to post this, in hope that it'll be of help for
some other users. This pertains boxes with Plesk + SpamAssassin.
On 7/27/11 1:49 PM, Adam Katz wrote:
It's probably an honest mistake from somebody at Dell that didn't
consider all the possibilities. Rather than trying to get that person
fired, how about explaining the issue to them?
I know its the law in the us, but putting braille dots on the drive up
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011, Michael Scheidell wrote:
it seems that people have gotten really stupid. sending an email, where they
ACKNOWLEDGE that I opted out, yet they decided to email me anyway?
Maybe you'll opt back in. Please? Look what nice shiny we'll send you
if you do...
--
John
Seems zixmail has not only decided to bastardize 'email' off the net,
but now, when informing someone they got one, makes suck bad freeking
headers that SA wants to tag it spam. take the bayes credit out and you
have 8 points on a legit email.
(wern't we talking about ruls that score 3 points?
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011, Michael Scheidell wrote:
Seems zixmail has not only decided to bastardize 'email' off the net, but
now, when informing someone they got one, makes suck bad freeking headers
that SA wants to tag it spam. take the bayes credit out and you have 8 points
on a legit email.
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:05:11 -0700, Adam Katz wrote:
MSECSSPAM% HAM% S/ORANK SCORE NAME
0 2.0912 1.5324 0.5770.50 (n/a) __TO_EQ_FROM
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20110726-r1151020-n/__TO_EQ_FROM/detail
nope, i talk only envelope, the above rule is
On 2011/07/27 13:23, John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011, Michael Scheidell wrote:
it seems that people have gotten really stupid. sending an email, where
they ACKNOWLEDGE that I opted out, yet they decided to email me anyway?
Maybe you'll opt back in. Please? Look what nice shiny
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011, Michael Scheidell wrote:
Seems zixmail has not only decided to bastardize 'email' off the net, but
now, when informing someone they got one, makes suck bad freeking headers
that SA wants to tag it spam. take the bayes credit out and you have 8 points
on a legit email.
j == jdow j...@earthlink.net writes:
j I seldom if ever opt out if existing spam. That's what my spam filter
j is for. It simply leads to nicely segregated spam I can deal with in a
j trice. If I opt out my spam filter feels lonely. It LIKES its food. It
j gets better with feeding.
Me too. I
14 matches
Mail list logo
