Re: Help with tagging hotmail spam

2011-10-03 Thread Alex
Hi, >> I have a fedora15 box with v3.3.2 and I have some hotmail spam that I >> can't figure out how to catch: >> >> http://pastebin.com/kkUUvYQp >> >> It's hitting BAYES_00 and no blacklists or other significant spam >> rules and not sure how to tag it. The user has reported receiving this >> spa

Re: Rule matching in a wrapped header

2011-10-03 Thread RW
On Mon, 03 Oct 2011 23:12:57 +0100 Frank Leonhardt wrote: > I'm having a great deal of trouble writing a rule to match something > in a Received: header. The problem is that sendmail(?) is whitespace > wrapping the header. In other words, instead of: Headers are converted into a single line befo

Rule matching in a wrapped header

2011-10-03 Thread Frank Leonhardt
I'm having a great deal of trouble writing a rule to match something in a Received: header. The problem is that sendmail(?) is whitespace wrapping the header. In other words, instead of: Received: from [192.168.1.31] (mux.example.com [1.2.3.4]) by mail.example.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id

Re: Minimal server specs for SA question

2011-10-03 Thread Martin Hepworth
Dns cache on the actual SA machine makes a huge difference! Martin On Monday, 3 October 2011, Simon Loewenthal wrote: > Martin Hepworth wrote: >> >> Also make sure youre running a caching nameserver to help with dns requests >> >> Drop unknown recipients at the start before SA checks really sto

Re: Minimal server specs for SA question

2011-10-03 Thread Simon Loewenthal
Martin Hepworth wrote: Also make sure youre running a caching nameserver to help with dns requests Drop unknown recipients at the start before SA checks really stop alot of junk too Martin On Monday, 3 October 2011, Alex B. wrote: > > > On 2011-10-03, at 6:08 AM, Simon Loewenthal wrote: > >

Re: Minimal server specs for SA question

2011-10-03 Thread Martin Hepworth
Also make sure youre running a caching nameserver to help with dns requests Drop unknown recipients at the start before SA checks really stop alot of junk too Martin On Monday, 3 October 2011, Alex B. wrote: > > > On 2011-10-03, at 6:08 AM, Simon Loewenthal wrote: > >> Hi there, >> >>I hav

Re: Minimal server specs for SA question

2011-10-03 Thread Alex B.
On 2011-10-03, at 6:08 AM, Simon Loewenthal wrote: > Hi there, > >I have to set-up a few low power SA boxes. Currently I'm used to > using Intel Xeon 2.6Ghz with 16Gb of memory, but these proposed boxes > are small. I won't buy one unless I know it can do the job. I know the > figures be

Re: "Your mailbox has exceeded..."

2011-10-03 Thread Daniel McDonald
On 10/1/11 2:04 AM, "Benny Pedersen" wrote: > On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 14:44:23 -0500, Daniel McDonald wrote: > >> Someone ran a beta ADDRBL back in 2009. I still have the code and >> run a >> couple of private EmailBL lists. > > cool want to share lists ? I don't think I can, based on from whe

Re: Minimal server specs for SA question

2011-10-03 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 12:08 +0200, Simon Loewenthal wrote: > Hi there, > > I have to set-up a few low power SA boxes. Currently I'm used to > using Intel Xeon 2.6Ghz with 16Gb of memory, but these proposed boxes > are small. I won't buy one unless I know it can do the job. I know the > figur

Re: Minimal server specs for SA question

2011-10-03 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Mon, 03 Oct 2011 12:08:15 +0200, Simon Loewenthal wrote: hardware: http://soekris.eu/shop/net6501_en/ 1.6 Ghz Intel Atom E660 (1 core, 2 threads) 1024Mb RAM Transcend mSATA SSD 32Gb MLC Cheers for any commentary. try boot one of your current xeons with mem=1024 in kernel boot line soekri

Re: Minimal server specs for SA question

2011-10-03 Thread Axb
On 2011-10-03 12:08, Simon Loewenthal wrote: Hi there, I have to set-up a few low power SA boxes. Currently I'm used to using Intel Xeon 2.6Ghz with 16Gb of memory, but these proposed boxes are small. I won't buy one unless I know it can do the job. I know the figures below are tiny, but

Re: Minimal server specs for SA question

2011-10-03 Thread Simon Loewenthal
On 10/03/2011 12:16 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 03.10.11 12:08, Simon Loewenthal wrote: >>I have to set-up a few low power SA boxes. Currently I'm used to >> using Intel Xeon 2.6Ghz with 16Gb of memory, but these proposed boxes >> are small. I won't buy one unless I know it can do t

Re: Minimal server specs for SA question

2011-10-03 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 03.10.11 12:08, Simon Loewenthal wrote: I have to set-up a few low power SA boxes. Currently I'm used to using Intel Xeon 2.6Ghz with 16Gb of memory, but these proposed boxes are small. I won't buy one unless I know it can do the job. I know the figures below are tiny, but I don't know th

Minimal server specs for SA question

2011-10-03 Thread Simon Loewenthal
Hi there, I have to set-up a few low power SA boxes. Currently I'm used to using Intel Xeon 2.6Ghz with 16Gb of memory, but these proposed boxes are small. I won't buy one unless I know it can do the job. I know the figures below are tiny, but I don't know the Intel Atoms and what they can r