Good afternoon list.
Please could someone explain the following
0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
URIBL was blocked.
See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for
more information.
The link shows:
On 23/01/12 12:22, Tom Kinghorn wrote:
Resolving the block might be as simple as using your own caching
nameserver to avoid being lumped together with other users queries;
setting up your own mirror of the DNS-blocklist; or paying to use the
blocklist. The choice is up to the DNS-Blocklist
I would look at getting a datafeed:
http://www.uribl.com/datafeed.shtml [7]
Out of interest, how much
volume of email are you processing to experience this?
Are you sharing
your external IP with any other of your ISP customers? Does your ISP do
anything strange with DNS queries?
On
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012, Munroe Sollog wrote:
I am trying to locate reason for performance spikes. I have read the
various wiki pages, and they suggest solutions but not a way to identify
the bottleneck. Is there way to increase logging so that I can begin to
identify or rule out the actual
Hi,
recently, my spamassassin started to score system messages as spam,
mentioning IP numbers not in the email:
Return-Path: x...@w1.oeko.net
Delivered-To: xx...@oeko.net
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by w3.oeko.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB1E725CEA
for
Am I looking at a bug in SA? And/Or, how do I debug this, please?
Kind regards, --Toni++
Baffling. Checking your maillogs, you don't see that IP anywhere?
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:59:43AM -0500, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Am I looking at a bug in SA? And/Or, how do I debug this, please?
Baffling. Checking your maillogs, you don't see that IP anywhere?
I do see this IP number several times, but it tried to send a completely
different email to
On 01/23, Toni Mueller wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:59:43AM -0500, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Am I looking at a bug in SA? And/Or, how do I debug this, please?
Baffling. Checking your maillogs, you don't see that IP anywhere?
I do see this IP number several times, but it tried to send
On 1/23/2012 12:19 PM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
On 01/23, Toni Mueller wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:59:43AM -0500, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Am I looking at a bug in SA? And/Or, how do I debug this, please?
Baffling. Checking your maillogs, you don't see that IP anywhere?
I do see
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 12:19:52PM -0500, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
On 01/23, Toni Mueller wrote:
I do see this IP number several times, but it tried to send a completely
different email to someone else on my server.
I was just about to ask if it might be showing up in other
On 1/23/2012 12:25 PM, Toni Mueller wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 12:19:52PM -0500, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
On 01/23, Toni Mueller wrote:
I do see this IP number several times, but it tried to send a completely
different email to someone else on my server.
I was just about to ask
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 12:29:29PM -0500, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
My thoughts were definitely the threads in amavis getting mixed up.
I would definitely look at that path because I'm sure if you do
spamassassin -t -D on the mbox format email post-amavis, you'll find
it doesn't repeat the
On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:50:42 +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
recently, my spamassassin started to score system messages as spam,
mentioning IP numbers not in the email:
is your own ip listed as internal_networks or and trusted_networks,
your own ip must be listed there, but this wont be stable if
On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 08:03 -0800, John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012, Munroe Sollog wrote:
I am trying to locate reason for performance spikes. I have read the
various wiki pages, and they suggest solutions but not a way to identify
the bottleneck. Is there way to increase
On Tue, 24 Jan 2012, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 08:03 -0800, John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012, Munroe Sollog wrote:
I am trying to locate reason for performance spikes. I have read the
various wiki pages, and they suggest solutions but not a way to identify
the
15 matches
Mail list logo
