On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 08:49 +0100, Amedeo Rinaldo wrote:
Is there a way/rule to count the fired ruled number ?
I've google a lot with no results (surely my fault ..wrong keywords)
..thanks for any help
If you just want to see what rules fire within a period of time and/or
count them, scan
Hi,
Anyone having the same problem ? When I declare doctype as below, spam
score result is always 0 but if I removed it scores as expected.
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//tr
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd;
Thank you.
On 2/23/2012 8:45 AM, zafer akyel wrote:
Hi,
Anyone having the same problem ? When I declare doctype as below, spam
score result is always 0 but if I removed it scores as expected.
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//tr
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd;
Thank you.
Hi,
This is the whole HTML we are testing.
http://pastebin.com/cjPYe9Gz
Thank you.
2012/2/23 Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com:
On 2/23/2012 8:45 AM, zafer akyel wrote:
Hi,
Anyone having the same problem ? When I declare doctype as below, spam
score result is always 0 but if I removed
On 2/23/2012 10:43 AM, zafer akyel wrote:
This is the whole HTML we are testing.
http://pastebin.com/cjPYe9Gz
Thank you.
How are you calling SpamAssassin exactly?
Hi, I am using java to execute the spamassassin
executeCommand = spamassassin -L -t;
String[] command = {CMD, /C, executeCommand};
ProcessBuilder probuilder = new ProcessBuilder(command);
probuilder.directory(new File(c:\\Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.4));
Process process =
On 2/23/2012 10:43 AM, zafer akyel wrote:
Hi,
This is the whole HTML we are testing.
http://pastebin.com/cjPYe9Gz
Thank you.
SA is designed to work on email messages. That looks like a webpage,
not an email. If you send that to SA as-is, you will not get good
results. You would want to
Thank you for your answer but it is an HTML email. That is the content of HTML
I am appending
message.append(From: + this._from + \n);
message.append(To: + this._to + \n);
message.append(Date: + formatter.format(d) + \n);
message.append(Subject: + this._subject + \n);
On 2/23/2012 11:22 AM, zafer akyel wrote:
Thank you for your answer but it is an HTML email. That is the content of HTML
I am appending
message.append(From: + this._from + \n);
message.append(To: + this._to + \n);
message.append(Date: + formatter.format(d) + \n);
Thank you very much for your answers. I will try and notify you. Thank you.
2012/2/23 Bowie Bailey bowie_bai...@buc.com:
On 2/23/2012 11:22 AM, zafer akyel wrote:
Thank you for your answer but it is an HTML email. That is the content of
HTML
I am appending
message.append(From: +
On 2/23/2012 10:58 AM, zafer akyel wrote:
Hi, I am using java to execute the spamassassin
executeCommand = spamassassin -L -t;
String[] command = {CMD, /C, executeCommand};
ProcessBuilder probuilder = new ProcessBuilder(command);
probuilder.directory(new
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 18:22 +0200, zafer akyel wrote:
Thank you for your answer but it is an HTML email. That is the content of HTML
I am appending
message.append(From: + this._from + \n);
message.append(To: + this._to + \n);
message.append(Date: + formatter.format(d) +
Martin Gregorie mar...@gregorie.org wrote:
A correctly formatted
message will have both the text/html part preceded by either a plaintext
body or a 'text/plain' part: the latter is preferable.
No plain text part is required. There could be only one part, html,
but it needs the right MIME
Two examples from the past half hour alone:
http://pastebin.com/SraBrj7r
http://pastebin.com/PRspRuLS
I'm getting flooded with spam these days. Bayes is on, I'm using the built-in
RBLs, hostkarma, mailspike, BRBL, botnet freemail plugin, pyzor, razor.. and
things are still sailing right
How is the email getting into your server? The only received header
is localhost...
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by heap.pbp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27604E44DB
for remo...@pbp.net; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:45:25 -0600
(CST)
testing
Amavis is stamping it. The rest of the header info is below in the pastebin
sample.
And just my luck.. *now* it's showing up in Razor and URIBL. Argh! It's as if
spammers are using me as a crash test dummy this year. :/
On Feb 23, 2012, at 12:13 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
How is the email
On 2/23/2012 12:19 PM, Jonathan Nichols wrote:
Amavis is stamping it. The rest of the header info is below in the
pastebin sample.
Roger, I see that now. Missed the split.
And just my luck.. *now* it's showing up in Razor and URIBL. Argh!
It's as if spammers are using me as a crash test dummy
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:10:13 -0500
Jonathan Nichols wrote:
Two examples from the past half hour alone:
http://pastebin.com/SraBrj7r
http://pastebin.com/PRspRuLS
I'm getting flooded with spam these days. Bayes is on,
... and things are still sailing right through with low scores.
Then
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:02:58 -0500, Joseph Brennan wrote:
Including a plain part is desirable in many cases but not all.
It is required if you want *me* to read it.
Hello,
I've just experienced a *very unusual scenario* where SA is checking the
reputation of the dynamic public IP address of the sending desktop
client's authorised SMTP connection to their SMTP server.
Usually SA would check the reputation of the IP address of SMTP relay,
not the
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 17:26 +, Walter Hurry wrote:
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:02:58 -0500, Joseph Brennan wrote:
Including a plain part is desirable in many cases but not all.
It is required if you want *me* to read it.
+1
Den 2012-02-23 18:10, Jonathan Nichols skrev:
http://pastebin.com/SraBrj7r
http://pastebin.com/PRspRuLS
Content analysis details: (6.7 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
--
--
1.7
Il 23/02/2012 13:49, Martin Gregorie ha scritto:
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 08:49 +0100, Amedeo Rinaldo wrote:
Is there a way/rule to count the fired ruled number ?
..[cut]..
If you just want to see what rules fire within a period of time and/or
count them, scan the mail log (/etc/log/maillog*)
1.3 SAGREY Adds score to spam from first-time senders
Now this is something that I have never seen before and am going to look into
this evening
Den 2012-02-23 18:50, Jonathan Nichols skrev:
Now this is something that I have never seen before and am going to
look into this evening
setup awl to mask on /32 and keep awl factor at 0.5
then follow the plugin guide
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:32:27 +
Mark Porthouse wrote:
Hello,
I've just experienced a *very unusual scenario* where SA is checking
the reputation of the dynamic public IP address of the sending
desktop client's authorised SMTP connection to their SMTP server.
I'm currently not
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 17:26 +, Walter Hurry wrote:
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:02:58 -0500, Joseph Brennan wrote:
Including a plain part is desirable in many cases but not all.
It is required if you want *me* to read it.
+1
+1
--
John
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 18:47 +0100, Amedeo Rinaldo wrote:
Il 23/02/2012 13:49, Martin Gregorie ha scritto:
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 08:49 +0100, Amedeo Rinaldo wrote:
Is there a way/rule to count the fired ruled number ?
..[cut]..
If you just want to see what rules fire within a period of
Hi guys,
I was not aware, that I can run bind9 and rbldnsd at the same time
on the same machine, exactly, I was thinking they will conflict with
each other... ;-)
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
--
# Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
Hi,
Is there a way/rule to count the fired ruled number ?
I've google a lot with no results (surely my fault ..wrong keywords)
..thanks for any help
If you just want to see what rules fire within a period of time and/or
count them, scan the mail log (/etc/log/maillog*) on my system. A good
Hi,
1.3 SAGREY Adds score to spam from first-time senders
Now this is something that I have never seen before and am going to look into
this evening
I've also started to investigate SAGREY, and it sounds like a pretty
cool solution (despite it not having been updated in
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Hi guys,
I was not aware, that I can run bind9 and rbldnsd at the same time
on the same machine, exactly, I was thinking they will conflict with
each other... ;-)
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
As long as they
Alex wrote:
Hi,
1.3 SAGREY Adds score to spam from first-time senders
Now this is something that I have never seen before and am going to look into
this evening
I've also started to investigate SAGREY, and it sounds like a pretty
cool solution (despite it not having
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012, Alex wrote:
Hi,
1.3 SAGREY Adds score to spam from first-time senders
Now this is something that I have never seen before and am going to look into
this evening
I've also started to investigate SAGREY, and it sounds like a pretty
cool solution
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 21:25:40 +
Mark Porthouse wrote:
On 23/02/2012 18:36, RW wrote:
We went though this on the bug tracker. SA is failing to
differentiate between an mx handover and submission. The main way
that it does this via internal and trusted network settings. If you
have
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 15:35:38 -0500
Jonathan Nichols wrote:
This sagrey plugin sounds great, I'm giving it a try now. Thanks for
the info.
I'd be wary about that. Personally, the FPs I've had in the past have
overwhelmingly first contact.
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 17:44 -0500, Alex wrote:
How have you extended the logwatch scripts beyond the ones available here:
http://logreporters.sourceforge.net/
I don't use amavis, so the only one of those that's useful to me would
be the Postfix one. Up until the appearance of Fedora 15 the
Am Mittwoch, 15. Februar 2012, 14:25:46 schrieb Michael Monnerie:
Starting now, the ZMI_GERMAN ruleset is available via a new channel:
# sa-update --channel sa.zmi.at --nogpg
Latest info:
- Key is now also available from
https://sa.zmi.at/sa-update-german/GPG.KEY
to be more conform to what
38 matches
Mail list logo
