Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 22.03.2012 10:19, schrieb Per Jessen:
> It's also the rate of change that is
>> interesting - I very rarely see two emails with the same link.
>>
>
> one more indicate for a bright planned campaign
> what are they try to push...?
It varies - one link I've just cli
Am 23.03.2012 09:02, schrieb Per Jessen:
> Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>> Am 22.03.2012 10:19, schrieb Per Jessen:
>> It's also the rate of change that is
>>> interesting - I very rarely see two emails with the same link.
>>>
>>
>> one more indicate for a bright planned campaign
>> what are they t
Den 2012-03-23 09:02, Per Jessen skrev:
http://files.jessen.ch/proxy.log
log mime type ?
if it ends in txt, mime will let me see it as text without download
into my c drive :)
Hi there everyone,
I have a many custom rules defined in the local.cf shown below. I
checked spamassassin -D --lint, and did not find any reference to it.
Neither were any error messages reported.
Any example is this private black list:-
describe RBODY_PDOMAINS1 private blacklist of doma
Indeed I certainly can.
http://pastebin.com/c2an4irw
On 23/03/12 13:44, Banyan He wrote:
> Maybe you can share with us the debug output for the second thought in
> this case, Simon.
>
> Best regards,
>
>
> Banyan He
> Blog: http://www.rootong.com
> Email: ban...@rootong.com
>
>
> On
# spamc -y -R < 20120323.spam
http://pastebin.com/kVFn71B3
Full email with headers via spamassassin -t . Slightly redacted:
http://pastebin.com/HFmWfZa6
On 23/03/12 13:59, Banyan He wrote:
> 60.Mar 23 10:39:43.265 [28017] dbg: config: read file
> /etc/spamassassin/local.cf
> 61.
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 11:54:47 -0400
Kiryl Hakhovich wrote:
>
> so here is my observation is that when email come spamd does less
> rules checking or something??? vs when i ran it manually via sa-learn
> it yell a lot more rules being detected.
>
> could it be that there is something i did not se
On 03/23/2012 11:23 AM, RW wrote:
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 11:54:47 -0400
Kiryl Hakhovich wrote:
so here is my observation is that when email come spamd does less
rules checking or something??? vs when i ran it manually via sa-learn
it yell a lot more rules being detected.
could it be that there
I want to create a rule to flag a mail with empty message body and
attachment. I have read about the PDFInfo plugin but I am not allowed to
enable any kind of plugin on server. So creating a rule is must for me. I
have created some rules previously, but the problem is I am not able to
understand, h
