On Thu, 12 Apr 2012, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Darxus, any chance you can add this information to the warning notice?
+1 for thresholds and current corpora size in that notice.
And I don't think it's obnoxious because once we get things working
again, it should be non-existent!
Agreed.
--
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012, Kris Deugau wrote:
John Hardin wrote:
The best you can do if you're doing forwarding for training, is to
require that the original ham/spam be forwarded as an RFC822 attachment,
Outlook is not consistently capable of doing this correctly - worse, the
behaviour changes
John Hardin wrote:
The best you can do if you're doing forwarding for training, is to
require that the original ham/spam be forwarded as an RFC822 attachment,
Some users with sane mail clients *can* be trained to do this - you just
have to find the right instructions.
If they're all using Ou
Den 2012-04-13 18:05, Ysahel skrev:
OK :) thank you very much for you,
In fact, we can also redirect the spam in a folder by using
"procmail".
Could you tell me please what type of file spam stored ( text or
binary )?
I searched a lot on the web but I got no result :(
google horde ingo proc
Ysahel,
What utility are you using to scan your email? We're using Amavisd and is
store in
/var/virusmail
If you're using Amavisd look in the config file for something like this
$QUARANTINEDIR = '/var/virusmails'; # -Q
Amavisd.conf
Here is how postfix works with Amavisd
INTERNET ==> (port 2
OK :) thank you very much for you,
In fact, we can also redirect the spam in a folder by using "procmail".
Could you tell me please what type of file spam stored ( text or binary )?
I searched a lot on the web but I got no result :(
thank you very much !!!
Simon Loewenthal-3 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 07:58 -0700, Ysahel wrote:
> I use Ubuntu 11.10, and I need to know
>
> 1/ where are the spams taggued by spamassassin are stored ??
>
All mail is tagged by SA. It adds a set of headers to each message. The
values in those headers say whether the message was classified as h
Den 2012-04-13 17:15, Kevin A. McGrail skrev:
On 4/13/2012 10:54 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Den 2012-04-13 07:39, haese skrev:
I am executing Spamassassin (version 3.2.5) through an Exim4
transport on a
Debian server. Everything in the routing process works fine and my
user_prefs file is consul
On 13/04/12 16:09, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 4/13/2012 10:58 AM, Ysahel wrote:
I use Ubuntu 11.10, and I need to know
1/ where are the spams taggued by spamassassin are stored ??
2/ what is the type of file of spam stored ( textual or binary )
thank you very much in advance !!
Ysahel, SpamAs
Hi,
SA does not store spam. It scans it. It is up to your to decide what to do with
it.
I send mine to Dovecot for delivery to the users' mailboxes.
S
--
Dogs are tough.
I've been interrogating this one for hours and he still won't tell me who's a
good boy.
simon@klunky / .co.uk / .org
Ys
On 4/13/2012 10:54 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Den 2012-04-13 07:39, haese skrev:
I am executing Spamassassin (version 3.2.5) through an Exim4
transport on a
Debian server. Everything in the routing process works fine and my
user_prefs file is consulted as required.
http://archive.apache.org/di
On 4/13/2012 10:58 AM, Ysahel wrote:
I use Ubuntu 11.10, and I need to know
1/ where are the spams taggued by spamassassin are stored ??
2/ what is the type of file of spam stored ( textual or binary )
thank you very much in advance !!
Ysahel, SpamAssassin is a tagging program and advanced pro
I use Ubuntu 11.10, and I need to know
1/ where are the spams taggued by spamassassin are stored ??
2/ what is the type of file of spam stored ( textual or binary )
thank you very much in advance !!
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Where-the-spams-are-stored-tp3368237
Den 2012-04-13 07:39, haese skrev:
I am executing Spamassassin (version 3.2.5) through an Exim4
transport on a
Debian server. Everything in the routing process works fine and my
user_prefs file is consulted as required.
http://archive.apache.org/dist/spamassassin/ hmm current releases from
20
On 11/04/12 03:50, Julian Yap wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Michael Parker wrote:
On Apr 10, 2012, at 4:12 PM, Julian Yap wrote:
I'm running SpamAssassin 3.3.2 port revision 6 (latest from FreeBSD
ports) on FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE 64-bit.
I recently upgraded my Perl from 5.10 to 5.14 b
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Ashvin Narayanan <
ash...@haeseandharris.com.au> wrote:
> Thank you for the reply.
>
> I am not using TextCat so didn't load the plugin as you suggest. The
> reason is that the following thread:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/users@spamassassin.apache.org/msg69225.
Hello Ashvin,
Friday, April 13, 2012, 7:28:27 AM, you wrote:
AN> I am not using TextCat so didn't load the plugin as you suggest.
In which case you won't get a hit on that rule as "
eval:check_for_faraway_charset()" uses that plugin if my memory
serves.
--
Best regards,
Niamh
17 matches
Mail list logo