Re: SpamAssassin Hanging on RTF Attachments

On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 09:31:40AM +0300, Henrik K wrote: > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 09:20:26PM -0700, John Evans wrote: > > On 2012-08-14 21:13, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > > >>Here's the output of -D -t on the file. I let it run for about > > >>10 minutes before giving up and killing the process. >

Re: SpamAssassin Hanging on RTF Attachments

On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 09:20:26PM -0700, John Evans wrote: > On 2012-08-14 21:13, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > >>Here's the output of -D -t on the file. I let it run for about > >>10 minutes before giving up and killing the process. > > > >Out of interest, can you let it run longer? Say an hour just

Re: SpamAssassin Hanging on RTF Attachments

On 2012-08-14 21:13, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: Here's the output of -D -t on the file. I let it run for about 10 minutes before giving up and killing the process. Out of interest, can you let it run longer? Say an hour just to see if does finish processing? regards, KAM You bet! I'll fire it

Re: SpamAssassin Hanging on RTF Attachments

Here's the output of -D -t on the file. I let it run for about 10 minutes before giving up and killing the process. Out of interest, can you let it run longer? Say an hour just to see if does finish processing? regards, KAM

Re: SpamAssassin Hanging on RTF Attachments

On 8/14/2012 11:47 PM, admin wrote: PS: I can't share my problematic RTF file since it contains a legal contract I'm not allowed to share with the public. Are you able to share the problematic file off-list? Can you share the Output of spamassassin -D -t on the file?

SpamAssassin Hanging on RTF Attachments

Greetings, I've spent many hours spread out over weeks scouring the Internet and message archives and FAQs and such, and am unable to find a solution to the problem I'm having. I have a Postifx+AmavisNew+SpamAssassin+ClamAV setup for my mail server. It's all running on Ubuntu Server 10.04 LT

Re: Received header syntax

On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:01:13 -0700 Ori Bani wrote: > There are a few changes we want to make to our outgoing email headers, > including to the Received headers that our MTA adds. I know that some > tools including SA have some tests that judge spamminess based on > malformed Received headers, but

Received header syntax

Hello, There are a few changes we want to make to our outgoing email headers, including to the Received headers that our MTA adds. I know that some tools including SA have some tests that judge spamminess based on malformed Received headers, but I have not been able to find anywhere that describes

Re: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL intermittent failure

On 8/14/2012 9:30 AM, Jim Schueler wrote: On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Jim Schueler mailto:jschue...@eloquency.com>> wrote: The attached contains two files: spamtoday.msg came out of a filter in my mail stream spamtoday.out is spamtoday.msg piped through 'spamassassin -t

Re: RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED

On 08/14, Jon-Paul Kelly wrote: > Are you running a local non-forwarding, > caching DNS server? > >I have a Plesk installation and am using the DNS server as provided by >Plesk. The nameservers are [2]ns1.smallgod.net, [3]ns2.smallgod.net If the smallgod.net name servers are pro

Re: RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED

On 8/14/2012 12:34 PM, Jon-Paul Kelly wrote: On Aug 14, 2012, at 14 9:03 AM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote: Have you looked at that link? yes Are you running a local non-forwarding, caching DNS server? I have a Plesk installation and am using the DNS serv

Re: RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED

On Aug 14, 2012, at 14 9:03 AM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote: > Have you looked at that link? yes > Are you running a local non-forwarding, > caching DNS server? I have a Plesk installation and am using the DNS server as provided by Plesk. The nameservers are ns1.smallgod.net, ns2.smallgod.

Re: RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED

Hello Ben, Tuesday, August 14, 2012, 3:30:18 PM, you wrote: BJ> The majority of the spam that our users receive is a direct result of BJ> this one rule; it seems that plenty of spammers are white-listed in this BJ> database, and it is a weighty test (it reduces the score by as much as 2 BJ> or 3

Re: RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED

On 8/14/2012 12:03 PM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote: On 08/14, Bowie Bailey wrote: If you want to disable the DNSWL lookup completely, you should zero out the main rules and the sub-rule: score RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED 0 score RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI 0 score RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW 0 score RCVD

Re: RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED

On 08/13, JP Kelly wrote: > How can I disable the DNSWL rule/plugin or whatever. Not just give it a > low/zero score but disable it completely. > I am tired of seeing RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED in my headers. The description for RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED is "The query to DNSWL was blocked. See http://wik

Re: RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED

On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Ben Johnson wrote: > The majority of the spam that our users receive is a direct result of > this one rule; it seems that plenty of spammers are white-listed in this > database, and it is a weighty test (it reduces the score by as much as 2 > or 3 points in some c

Re: RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED

On 8/14/2012 9:33 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote: > On 8/14/2012 12:35 AM, JP Kelly wrote: >> How can I disable the DNSWL rule/plugin or whatever. Not just give it >> a low/zero score but disable it completely. >> I am tired of seeing RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED in my headers. > > If you set the score to zero,

Re: RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED

On 8/14/2012 12:35 AM, JP Kelly wrote: How can I disable the DNSWL rule/plugin or whatever. Not just give it a low/zero score but disable it completely. I am tired of seeing RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED in my headers. If you set the score to zero, the rule will be disabled and you should no longer s

Re: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL intermittent failure

On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Jim Schueler wrote: > The attached contains two files: > spamtoday.msg came out of a filter in my mail stream > spamtoday.out is spamtoday.msg piped through 'spamassassin -t' > > This problem occurs very intermittently. Out of 300 daily emails, only 4 > or 5