Re: Words with embedded symbols

2012-11-12 Thread Cathryn Mataga
Here's another version. This successfully recognises all four of your examples and doesn't fire on any of my other spam test messages: describe MG_TWOLETTER_OBFUSCATION Two letter obfuscation (X:X X :X)) header MG_TWOLETTER_OBFUSCATION Subject =~ /[A-Z][:%~;^][A-Z]\s{0,1}[:%~;^][A-Z0

Re: What is the AM.WBL rule?

2012-11-12 Thread Steve Allison
On 12/11/2012 13:02, Jari Fredriksson wrote: 12.11.2012 14:58, Steve Allison kirjoitti: Dear List, What is AM.WBL? I can't find it in the score files. First entry of this header, "AM.WBL=5" X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.317 tagged_above=-500 required=5 tests=[AM.WBL=5, AWL=-0.810, BAYES_50

Re: What is the AM.WBL rule?

2012-11-12 Thread Jari Fredriksson
12.11.2012 14:58, Steve Allison kirjoitti: > Dear List, > > What is AM.WBL? I can't find it in the score files. > > First entry of this header, "AM.WBL=5" > > X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.317 tagged_above=-500 required=5 > tests=[AM.WBL=5, > AWL=-0.810, BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=

What is the AM.WBL rule?

2012-11-12 Thread Steve Allison
Dear List, What is AM.WBL? I can't find it in the score files. First entry of this header, "AM.WBL=5" X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.317 tagged_above=-500 required=5 tests=[AM.WBL=5, AWL=-0.810, BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_02

Re: Sample of a nasty one IMHO

2012-11-12 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Sun, 2012-11-11 at 19:32 -0500, Joseph Acquisto wrote: > If I did it right, it seems to have checked. In fact, a message that was > classified as SPAM just came it, and it does show RBL checks. > That sounds like its working OK. > Hmm. I did setup dnsmasq as my local caching thinglet . . .