Re: A plugin for banned words?

2012-12-30 Thread Jari Fredriksson
30.12.2012 22:19, Ned Slider kirjoitti: > On 30/12/12 19:27, Jari Fredriksson wrote: >> 30.12.2012 21:09, RW kirjoitti: >>> On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 19:13:01 +0200 >>> Jari Fredriksson wrote: >>> >>> Finally they are getting some Bayes too, and exterbal URIBL databases are recognizing URIs in

Re: A plugin for banned words?

2012-12-30 Thread Ned Slider
On 30/12/12 19:27, Jari Fredriksson wrote: 30.12.2012 21:09, RW kirjoitti: On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 19:13:01 +0200 Jari Fredriksson wrote: Finally they are getting some Bayes too, and exterbal URIBL databases are recognizing URIs in the payload. So I have now lowered the points on my rule to 5.5.

Re: A plugin for banned words?

2012-12-30 Thread Ned Slider
On 30/12/12 18:44, Jari Fredriksson wrote: 30.12.2012 20:25, Ned Slider kirjoitti: Where is this list? I can't find a jboss-us...@redhat.com (on Red Hat mailing lists, see https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo), only a jboss-u...@lists.jboss.org on lists.jboss.org. Can you point to some exam

Re: A plugin for banned words?

2012-12-30 Thread Jari Fredriksson
30.12.2012 21:09, RW kirjoitti: > IIWY I'd look at how well Bayes is doing in the list, it may be that > you can safely add a meta rule to boost the score for the higher > scoring bayes rules in the list, and then add a few low-scoring > subject rules for "Vs" and some of the other common words. L

Re: A plugin for banned words?

2012-12-30 Thread Jari Fredriksson
30.12.2012 21:09, RW kirjoitti: > On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 19:13:01 +0200 > Jari Fredriksson wrote: > > >> Finally they are getting some Bayes too, and exterbal URIBL databases >> are recognizing URIs in the payload. So I have now lowered the points >> on my rule to 5.5. Also created a local anti-DNSWL_

Re: A plugin for banned words?

2012-12-30 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Sun, 2012-12-30 at 19:13 +0200, Jari Fredriksson wrote: > Seems to be a brain dead idea from JBoss/Red Hat to create such a system > in internet > > - web gui for discussions > This alone is bad enough if you don't do proper validation of would-be members. The WINE project, which also did user

Re: A plugin for banned words?

2012-12-30 Thread RW
On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 19:13:01 +0200 Jari Fredriksson wrote: > Finally they are getting some Bayes too, and exterbal URIBL databases > are recognizing URIs in the payload. So I have now lowered the points > on my rule to 5.5. Also created a local anti-DNSWL_MED for mail > coming from redhat having

Re: A plugin for banned words?

2012-12-30 Thread Jari Fredriksson
30.12.2012 20:25, Ned Slider kirjoitti: > On 30/12/12 17:13, Jari Fredriksson wrote: >> 30.12.2012 18:05, Jari Fredriksson kirjoitti: So far I have created many meta rules containing those words, but the >> list is endless. The words like mostly U.S. town names and U.S. >> sports >

Re: A plugin for banned words?

2012-12-30 Thread Jari Fredriksson
30.12.2012 20:25, Ned Slider kirjoitti: > Where is this list? > > I can't find a jboss-us...@redhat.com (on Red Hat mailing lists, see > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo), only a > jboss-u...@lists.jboss.org on lists.jboss.org. > > Can you point to some example spam in the list archives plea

Re: A plugin for banned words?

2012-12-30 Thread Ned Slider
On 30/12/12 17:13, Jari Fredriksson wrote: 30.12.2012 18:05, Jari Fredriksson kirjoitti: So far I have created many meta rules containing those words, but the list is endless. The words like mostly U.S. town names and U.S. sports team names. On the face of it that doesn't sound too difficult.

Re: A plugin for banned words?

2012-12-30 Thread Jari Fredriksson
30.12.2012 18:05, Jari Fredriksson kirjoitti: >> So far I have created many meta rules containing those words, but the >> >> list is endless. The words like mostly U.S. town names and U.S. sports >> >> team names. > > On the face of it that doesn't sound too difficult. > > >> >> In addition to th

Re: A plugin for banned words?

2012-12-30 Thread Jari Fredriksson
30.12.2012 17:48, RW kirjoitti: > On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 16:43:53 +0200 > Jari Fredriksson wrote: > >> I receive tons of spam currently on one mailing list. The list post >> has following features >> >> - sender gets negative points because it is listed in DNSWL_MED > It's Redhat that's in DNSWL_MED

Re: A plugin for banned words?

2012-12-30 Thread Jari Fredriksson
30.12.2012 17:34, Martin Gregorie kirjoitti: > 1) not a plugin, but would my 'portmanteau' rule generation and > maintenance system by of any help? Its intention is to maintain lists of > words or patterns in easily lists (one item per line). I use it to > maintain rules with up to a couple hundred

Re: A plugin for banned words?

2012-12-30 Thread RW
On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 16:43:53 +0200 Jari Fredriksson wrote: > > I receive tons of spam currently on one mailing list. The list post > has following features > > - sender gets negative points because it is listed in DNSWL_MED It's Redhat that's in DNSWL_MED - consider putting them in your truste

Re: A plugin for banned words?

2012-12-30 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Sun, 2012-12-30 at 16:43 +0200, Jari Fredriksson wrote: > The rules would be much cleaner if the banned words would be in a flat > file or such, maintaining the lists would be easier. > > Is there such plugin already? > Two suggestions: 1) not a plugin, but would my 'portmanteau' rule genera

A plugin for banned words?

2012-12-30 Thread Jari Fredriksson
I receive tons of spam currently on one mailing list. The list post has following features - sender gets negative points because it is listed in DNSWL_MED - the email is in html and has lots of tokens similar in spam and ham. Bayes training is slow and seems futile The spam has very common patt