On 1/15/2013 5:22 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jan 2013, Ben Johnson wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 1/15/2013 1:55 PM, John Hardin wrote:
>>> On Tue, 15 Jan 2013, Ben Johnson wrote:
>>>
On 1/14/2013 8:16 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Ben Johnson wrote:
>
> Question:
On 1/16/2013 2:02 AM, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
> On 1/15/13 5:26 PM, Ben Johnson wrote:
>
>>
>> In postfix's main.cf:
>>
>
>>
>> Hmm, very interesting. No, I have no greylisting in place as yet, and
>> no, my userbase doesn't demand immediate delivery. I will look into
>> greylisting further.
>
> I
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013, Ben Johnson wrote:
On 1/15/2013 5:22 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013, Ben Johnson wrote:
Wow! Adding several more reject_rbl_client entries to the
smtpd_recipient_restrictions directive in the Postfix configuration
seems to be having a tremendous impact. The am
On 1/16/2013 10:49 AM, Ben Johnson wrote:
On 1/15/2013 5:22 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013, Ben Johnson wrote:
Wow! Adding several more reject_rbl_client entries to the
smtpd_recipient_restrictions directive in the Postfix configuration
seems to be having a tremendous impact. The
On 1/16/2013 9:49 AM, Ben Johnson wrote:
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
> reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
spamcop has a reputation of being somewhat aggressive on blocking,
and their website recommends using it in a scoring system (eg.
SpamAssassin) rather than for outright blocking. Th
On 1/16/2013 11:00 AM, John Hardin wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2013, Ben Johnson wrote:
>
>> On 1/15/2013 5:22 PM, John Hardin wrote:
>>> On Tue, 15 Jan 2013, Ben Johnson wrote:
Wow! Adding several more reject_rbl_client entries to the
smtpd_recipient_restrictions directive in the Pos
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013, Ben Johnson wrote:
On 1/16/2013 11:00 AM, John Hardin wrote:
That's odd. That suggests you SA wasn't looking up those DNSBLs, or they
would have contributed to the score.
Check your trusted networks setting. One difference between SMTP-time
and SA-time DNSBL checks is tha
On 1/16/2013 1:18 PM, Ben Johnson wrote:
On 1/16/2013 11:00 AM, John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013, Ben Johnson wrote:
Is it possible that the training I've been doing over the last week or
so wasn't *effective* until recently, say, after restarting some
component of the mail stack? My un
Hi,
>>> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
>>> reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
>>> reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org,
>>> reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org,
>>> reject_rbl_client cbl.abuseat.org,
>>> reject_rbl_client dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net,
>>
>> Several of those are combined in
On 1/16/2013 2:22 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> On 1/16/2013 1:18 PM, Ben Johnson wrote:
>>
>> On 1/16/2013 11:00 AM, John Hardin wrote:
>>> On Wed, 16 Jan 2013, Ben Johnson wrote:
>>>
Is it possible that the training I've been doing over the last week or
so wasn't *effective* until recentl
10 matches
Mail list logo
