--On Thursday, March 07, 2013 11:26 PM +0100 Benny Pedersen m...@junc.eu
wrote:
only bayes hitting ?, and it autolearns ham ?
Presumably the autolearn=ham applies to anything that doesn't get marked as
spam. Once I move it to my Uncaught folder, it gets retrained that night as
spam.
But
On Sat, 2013-03-09 at 09:23 -0800, John Hardin wrote:
Regarding that analogy, SA is not an antivirus tool, and any attempt to
make it one would be met with resistance. SA is also not an email
*security* tool.
Agreed. If I thought I needed an antivirus tool I's run Clamav.
An email
Hi,
I received an email that was tagged with KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP, which
means it was listed in the Spamhaus Don't Route Or Peer List.
However, I've checked every IP and domain in the email, and none are
listed on any spamhaus list, even as of a minute ago. What is it in
this message that is
Kenneth Porter skrev den 2013-03-09 14:44:
Presumably the autolearn=ham applies to anything that doesn't get
marked as spam.
nope, it still need to score below -0.1 to learn as ham, so i would
check whitelist scores, or scores that hits on negatives
Once I move it to my Uncaught folder,
On Sat, 2013-03-09 at 09:23 -0800, John Hardin wrote:
On Sat, 9 Mar 2013, Martin Gregorie wrote:
Presumably the, ahem, misguided js interpretation is being triggered by
the script/script tags, so wouldn't the regex I've used here
mimeheader JS_TRAP_RULE name =~ /script/
be a more
On Sat, 2013-03-09 at 20:56 +, Martin Gregorie wrote:
Correction:
describe SCRIPTED_NAME Attachment name or filename is a script
mimeheader __SCRIPTN1Content-Type =~ /name.*\=.*script/
mimeheader __SCRIPTN2Content-Disposition =~ /filename.*\=.*script/
meta SCRIPTED_NAME
