On 2013/04/22 06:27, Thomas Cameron wrote:
On 04/08/2013 03:52 AM, Andrzej A. Filip wrote:
On 04/08/2013 05:12 AM, Thomas Cameron wrote:
[...]
I want to delete any spam that scores over 10, though. I believe that I
should insert a new rule between the first and second, and I want to use
the X-S
On 04/22/2013 09:29 AM, Andrzej A. Filip wrote:
False positives in super-spam (>10 SA score) should be very rare.
Exactly my point.
Are you ready/willing to report spam you receive to spamcop.net, razor,
pyzor, ...?
That's an interesting question...
Each user has their own spam folders, so
On 04/22/2013 09:03 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 22.04.13 08:27, Thomas Cameron wrote:
Currently I'm using procmail recipes for individual users, but I'm
leaning heavily towards going back to spamass-milter, and rejecting
everything that scores 10 or more.
with thing like spamass-milte
On 4/20/2013 3:20 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Ben Johnson skrev den 2013-04-20 05:02:
>
>> Yes, I believe that me and the system always execute SA commands as the
>> "amavis" user. When I was using the SQL setup, I had the following in
>> local.cf:
>>
>> bayes_path /var/lib/amavis/.spamassassin/
Andrzej A. Filip skrev den 2013-04-22 16:29:
Are you ready/willing to report spam you receive to spamcop.net,
razor,
pyzor, ...?
or dnswl, return-path ? :)
--
senders that put my email into body content will deliver it to my own
trashcan, so if you like to get reply, dont do it
On 04/22/2013 03:27 PM, Thomas Cameron wrote:
> On 04/08/2013 03:52 AM, Andrzej A. Filip wrote:
>> On 04/08/2013 05:12 AM, Thomas Cameron wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> I want to delete any spam that scores over 10, though. I believe that I
>>> should insert a new rule between the first and second, and I wan
On 22.04.13 08:27, Thomas Cameron wrote:
Currently I'm using procmail recipes for individual users, but I'm
leaning heavily towards going back to spamass-milter, and rejecting
everything that scores 10 or more.
with thing like spamass-milter I found REFUSING mail (not devnulling!)
sa safe. I a
On 04/08/2013 03:52 AM, Andrzej A. Filip wrote:
On 04/08/2013 05:12 AM, Thomas Cameron wrote:
[...]
I want to delete any spam that scores over 10, though. I believe that I
should insert a new rule between the first and second, and I want to use
the X-Spam-Level header. But since it uses asterisk
