On Thu, 2013-05-23 at 02:29 +0100, RW wrote:
> On Wed, 22 May 2013 20:44:58 +0200 Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > > Is the autolearning supposed to accelerate? I can't help but feel
> > > like it may just be feeding itself it's own data or something.
> >
> > There is no feedback loop in the learni
Marc Perkel skrev den 2013-05-23 16:57:
My spamd tasks are using 100M to 300M each. Seems excessive. What can
I do to reduce this?
disable plugins not needed, or reduce rules, reduce spamd childs, as
you say, you have the resources :)
--
senders that put my email into body content will deliv
On Thu, 23 May 2013 07:57:17 -0700
Marc Perkel wrote:
> My spamd tasks are using 100M to 300M each. Seems excessive. What can
> I do to reduce this?
Do you actually mean "memory size" (address space) or resident memory?
The former isn't particular important.
> My spamd tasks are using 100M to 300M each. Seems excessive.
That's about normal for a 64-bit perl with current rulesets
plus some additions. The in-memory (RSS) footprint is
propbably 1/2 to 2/3 of that.
> What can I do to reduce this?
On a 32-bit platform the virtual memory requirement is pe
also look at compiling the rulesets
--
Martin Hepworth, CISSP
Oxford, UK
On 23 May 2013 16:29, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 5/23/2013 10:57 AM, Marc Perkel wrote:
>
>> My spamd tasks are using 100M to 300M each. Seems excessive. What can I
>> do to reduce this?
>>
>> Use less rules. Use mor
On 5/23/2013 10:57 AM, Marc Perkel wrote:
My spamd tasks are using 100M to 300M each. Seems excessive. What can
I do to reduce this?
Use less rules. Use more RBLs. Are you using any non-stock rules and
you can check if they are huge memory hogs.
My spamd tasks are using 100M to 300M each. Seems excessive. What can I
do to reduce this?
--
Marc Perkel - Sales/Support
supp...@junkemailfilter.com
http://www.junkemailfilter.com
Junk Email Filter dot com
415-992-3400
Thanks, Kevin, I checked and now this rule is only causing 1.0 spam score.
--
View this message in context:
http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/Rule-TVD-FROM-1-causing-all-our-emails-spam-scores-go-up-tp104732p104800.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.c
Thanks, Kevin, I checked and now this rule is only causing 1.0 spam score.
Thanks very much.
--
Thanks, Henry
发件人: Kevin A. McGrail [via SpamAssassin]
[mailto:ml-node+s1065346n104771...@n5.nabble.com]
发送时间: 2013年05月21日 00:35
收件人: Henry Draper
主题: Re: Rule 'TVD_FROM_1' causing all our emails' sp