Hello,
I have a low scoring pills spam:
http://pastebin.com/q6nWqzMR
I only get the following on it:
* 1.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L3 RBL: Low reputation (-3)
* [219.94.129.82 listed in bl.mailspike.net]
* 0.0 SUBJECT_FUZZY_CHEAP Attempt to obfuscate words in
Subject:
* 0.5 FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL
On Fri, 16 Aug 2013 12:36:13 +0100
Andrew Hearn wrote:
Hello,
I have a low scoring pills spam:
http://pastebin.com/q6nWqzMR
I only get the following on it:
* 1.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L3 RBL: Low reputation (-3)
* [219.94.129.82 listed in bl.mailspike.net]
* 0.0 SUBJECT_FUZZY_CHEAP
In the future, if you're not prepared to show the actual problem with their
actual data, please don't waste our time.
You know that's the sort of thing I hate about the Open Source community, the
big ego trips by the crusty old dudes who've been around forever and enjoy
giving the
RW skrev den 2013-08-16 15:11:
I have a low scoring pills spam:
http://pastebin.com/q6nWqzMR
Content analysis details: (13.3 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
--
--
0.1 RELAY_STAR
I'm getting some ALL_TRUSTED on spam and wasn't sure what to list in as
trusted networks. My mail server has incoming messages port forwarded by
iptables. So everything looks like it comes from an internal network.
Right now, I have our LAN on the trusted networks but not the network
that NAT's
On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 09:27 -0700, Gregg Stock wrote:
I'm getting some ALL_TRUSTED on spam and wasn't sure what to list in as
trusted networks. My mail server has incoming messages port forwarded by
iptables. So everything looks like it comes from an internal network.
Right now, I have our LAN
Alternatively, I pulled fire alarms at Microsoft and it is very possible people
at Spamhaus also spent reacting to your email because of the erroneous
information posted.
So while John may have been slightly impolitic,and fairly rude, he isn't wrong,
and it isn't about ego (in this case). I
I have an MX record that points to our staic IP. So I don't have an
external MTA.
I had a problem with postfix when I added the network that port forwards
to mynetworks, I had an open relay for a couple of hours :(
On 8/16/2013 9:43 AM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 09:27
On 8/16/2013 9:43 AM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
If your mail is being routed via your ISP's MTAs you probably need to
add them to trusted_networks too.
internal_networks it is.
On 16.08.13 10:45, Gregg Stock wrote:
I have an MX record that points to our staic IP. So I don't have an
external
After making a change a weight, noticed it did not take after a restart.
Ran lint and found the snippet provided below. I'm confused as I see some of
these in the header of some email:
Aug 16 16:03:11.268 [15719] dbg: config: warning: score set for non-existent
rule RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4
Aug 16
10 matches
Mail list logo