Low scoring pill spam

2013-08-16 Thread Andrew Hearn
Hello, I have a low scoring pills spam: http://pastebin.com/q6nWqzMR I only get the following on it: * 1.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L3 RBL: Low reputation (-3) * [219.94.129.82 listed in bl.mailspike.net] * 0.0 SUBJECT_FUZZY_CHEAP Attempt to obfuscate words in Subject: * 0.5 FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL

Re: Low scoring pill spam

2013-08-16 Thread RW
On Fri, 16 Aug 2013 12:36:13 +0100 Andrew Hearn wrote: Hello, I have a low scoring pills spam: http://pastebin.com/q6nWqzMR I only get the following on it: * 1.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L3 RBL: Low reputation (-3) * [219.94.129.82 listed in bl.mailspike.net] * 0.0 SUBJECT_FUZZY_CHEAP

Re: Big problems with senders who use Microsoft Bigfish (a.k.a. FrontBridge)

2013-08-16 Thread Nigel Smith
In the future, if you're not prepared to show the actual problem with their actual data, please don't waste our time. You know that's the sort of thing I hate about the Open Source community, the big ego trips by the crusty old dudes who've been around forever and enjoy giving the

Re: Low scoring pill spam

2013-08-16 Thread Benny Pedersen
RW skrev den 2013-08-16 15:11: I have a low scoring pills spam: http://pastebin.com/q6nWqzMR Content analysis details: (13.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description -- -- 0.1 RELAY_STAR

Trusted Networks

2013-08-16 Thread Gregg Stock
I'm getting some ALL_TRUSTED on spam and wasn't sure what to list in as trusted networks. My mail server has incoming messages port forwarded by iptables. So everything looks like it comes from an internal network. Right now, I have our LAN on the trusted networks but not the network that NAT's

Re: Trusted Networks

2013-08-16 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 09:27 -0700, Gregg Stock wrote: I'm getting some ALL_TRUSTED on spam and wasn't sure what to list in as trusted networks. My mail server has incoming messages port forwarded by iptables. So everything looks like it comes from an internal network. Right now, I have our LAN

Re: Big problems with senders who use Microsoft Bigfish (a.k.a. FrontBridge)

2013-08-16 Thread Neil Schwartzman
Alternatively, I pulled fire alarms at Microsoft and it is very possible people at Spamhaus also spent reacting to your email because of the erroneous information posted. So while John may have been slightly impolitic,and fairly rude, he isn't wrong, and it isn't about ego (in this case). I

Re: Trusted Networks

2013-08-16 Thread Gregg Stock
I have an MX record that points to our staic IP. So I don't have an external MTA. I had a problem with postfix when I added the network that port forwards to mynetworks, I had an open relay for a couple of hours :( On 8/16/2013 9:43 AM, Martin Gregorie wrote: On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 09:27

Re: Trusted Networks

2013-08-16 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 8/16/2013 9:43 AM, Martin Gregorie wrote: If your mail is being routed via your ISP's MTAs you probably need to add them to trusted_networks too. internal_networks it is. On 16.08.13 10:45, Gregg Stock wrote: I have an MX record that points to our staic IP. So I don't have an external

SA not honoring entry in local.cf

2013-08-16 Thread Joe Acquisto-j4
After making a change a weight, noticed it did not take after a restart. Ran lint and found the snippet provided below. I'm confused as I see some of these in the header of some email: Aug 16 16:03:11.268 [15719] dbg: config: warning: score set for non-existent rule RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 Aug 16