On 14/11/2013 11:14, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
On 11/12/2013 1:39 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
On 13/11/2013 04:38, jpff wrote:
Perhaps on account of all the spam coming out of yahoo?
I see far more trash coming out of gmail, yet they never seem to list
them...
Yeah, well when your the 600 pound G
On 11/12/2013 1:39 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
On 13/11/2013 04:38, jpff wrote:
Perhaps on account of all the spam coming out of yahoo?
I see far more trash coming out of gmail, yet they never seem to list
them...
Yeah, well when your the 600 pound Gorilla you can sit where you want...
Ted
I
On Wednesday, November 13 2013, Florian Lindner wrote:
> What is about autolearning, which is not done using sa-learn? Does this need
> the --allow-tell switch?
autolearn is done by spamd internally, not needing any intervention by
external programs, therefore it also doesn't need --allow-tell.
Am Mittwoch, 13. November 2013, 15:27:52 schrieb Sergio Durigan Junior:
> On Wednesday, November 13 2013, Florian Lindner wrote:
> > Hello,
>
> Hey there,
>
> > I'm a bit confused by the allow-tell option in spamd.
> >
> > My setup is so that all configuration is done by the system users, they
>
On Wednesday, November 13 2013, Florian Lindner wrote:
> Hello,
Hey there,
> I'm a bit confused by the allow-tell option in spamd.
>
> My setup is so that all configuration is done by the system users, they use
> spamc only for perfomance reasons. Users use their local bayes database and
> sho
Hello,
I'm a bit confused by the allow-tell option in spamd.
My setup is so that all configuration is done by the system users, they use
spamc only for perfomance reasons. Users use their local bayes database and
should of course be able to update this database or use remote services like
pyzo
