My PC is connected via a Verizon dynamically-allocated IP address, which
is on several RBLs. If I send mail directly from my PC to my linux mail
server, spamassassin flags it. This is generally not a big deal for me,
as I usually use a mail client on the server itself.
However, from time to
On 28.03.14 15:23, Pat Traynor wrote:
My PC is connected via a Verizon dynamically-allocated IP address, which
is on several RBLs. If I send mail directly from my PC to my linux mail
server, spamassassin flags it. This is generally not a big deal for me,
as I usually use a mail client on the
On 3/28/2014 3:23 PM, Pat Traynor wrote:
My PC is connected via a Verizon dynamically-allocated IP address, which
is on several RBLs. If I send mail directly from my PC to my linux mail
server, spamassassin flags it. This is generally not a big deal for me,
as I usually use a mail client on
On Fri, 28 Mar 2014, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 3/28/2014 3:23 PM, Pat Traynor wrote:
My PC is connected via a Verizon dynamically-allocated IP address, which
is on several RBLs. If I send mail directly from my PC to my linux mail
server, spamassassin flags it. This is generally not a big
Pat Traynor wrote:
My PC is connected via a Verizon dynamically-allocated IP address, which
is on several RBLs. If I send mail directly from my PC to my linux mail
server, spamassassin flags it. This is generally not a big deal for me,
as I usually use a mail client on the server itself.
Kris Deugau skrev den 2014-03-28 20:51:
(PBL entries in particular are submitted in part by the netblock
owner/operators themselves, as IP ranges which should not be
generating
direct-to-MX email traffic. Most other DNSBLs list data in a similar
context; they should not be used for deep