On 06/26/2014 04:23 PM, motty cruz wrote:
as you can see, looks like Amavisd did not scan, spamassassing should have
stop this email.
yes, it really looked in the original mail that amavis did not scan it. The
question is why it did not scan it.
check the logs to see the reason - if amavis
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 19:02:42 -0600
Philip Prindeville wrote:
Since #x042C is outside the US-ASCII character set, this would be an
encoding violation.
It's not.
In HTML #x042C is an ASCII representation of a unicode character. It
represents a character within HTML, but as far as mime is
Thank you,
I can't figureout why spammy email get very little score,
X-Quarantine-ID: 4QFxoaNchYOk
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at fqdn.com
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, MIME error: error: unexpected end of
header
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.102
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
On 27.06.14 07:50, motty cruz wrote:
I can't figureout why spammy email get very little score,
X-Quarantine-ID: 4QFxoaNchYOk
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at fqdn.com
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, MIME error: error: unexpected end of
header
This might explain much. seems that
On Jun 27, 2014, at 7:30 AM, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote:
As I mentioned before, the real violation is in the previous mime
section, which claims 7bit, but contains octets with the high-bit set.
Yup. Just submitted a patch for this:
On Jun 25, 2014, at 8:45 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:42:22 -0700
Bruce Sackett wrote:
I apologize, I’m sure it’s been covered, but I have not been
successful finding results in searches on the web or through the
history of the list. I get
Looking at my mail streams I see evidence that spammers sometimes
add faked SpamAssassin headers to their messages (I assume to try
to trick recipients into thinking that the message has already been
given a clean bill-of-health).
I wrote a few test rules to look for these pre-existing X-Spam-
28.06.2014 04:43, David B Funk kirjoitti:
Looking at my mail streams I see evidence that spammers sometimes
add faked SpamAssassin headers to their messages (I assume to try
to trick recipients into thinking that the message has already been
given a clean bill-of-health).
I wrote a few test
28.06.2014 05:47, Jari Fredriksson kirjoitti:
28.06.2014 04:43, David B Funk kirjoitti:
Looking at my mail streams I see evidence that spammers sometimes
add faked SpamAssassin headers to their messages (I assume to try
to trick recipients into thinking that the message has already been
given
