On Fri, 04 Jul 2014 14:26:43 +0200
Christian Laußat wrote:
> There is an old p0f plugin on
> http://whatever.truls.org/spamassassin.text.shtml.
> p0f didn't seem maintained since 2006, but there is a new rewritten
> version on http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/p0f3/ (with a different API).
>
> I have
On 07/04/2014 11:21 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
there is no reason why sa-milter should know about users - it would require
adding new useless code to it. Especially not when there is no local user,
which is something spamd must take care about, so there's no need to
duplicate this job
On 07/04/2014 07:02 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I have read the man page multiple times. spamass-milter passes the local
part of mail recipient to spamd, which is not necessarily a username.
spamass-milter even can call "sendmail -bv" to get the user, but it still
may not be local user.
On 07/04/2014 07:02 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I have read the man page multiple times. spamass-milter passes the local
part of mail recipient to spamd, which is not necessarily a username.
spamass-milter even can call "sendmail -bv" to get the user, but it still
may not be local user.
On Fri, 04 Jul 2014 14:26:43 +0200
Christian Lau__at wrote:
> Do you think passive OS detection is still usefull today?
It's mildly useful. We throw p0f results into Bayes, and indeed,
"Windows XP" is a pretty strong spam indicator. But it's not a magic
bullet.
Regards,
David.
On Fri, 4 Jul 2014, Christian Laußat wrote:
There is an old p0f plugin on
http://whatever.truls.org/spamassassin.text.shtml.
p0f didn't seem maintained since 2006, but there is a new rewritten version
on http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/p0f3/ (with a different API).
I have written a plugin to use t
There is an old p0f plugin on
http://whatever.truls.org/spamassassin.text.shtml.
p0f didn't seem maintained since 2006, but there is a new rewritten
version on http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/p0f3/ (with a different API).
I have written a plugin to use this new version of p0f (
https://kvm.laussat.
On 07/04/2014 05:27 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I repeat: spamass-milter does not (and can not) know about local users.
On 04.07.14 06:30, Steve Bergman wrote:
SPAMASS_MILTER(8)
I have read the man page multiple times. spamass-milter passes the local
part of mail recipient to spamd, wh
On 07/04/2014 05:27 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> I repeat: spamass-milter does not (and can not) know about local users.
SPAMASS_MILTER(8)
-u defaultuser
Pass the username part of the first recipient to spamc with the
-u flag. This allows user preferences files to be used. If the
mess
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6995
On 07/03/2014 09:38 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I see you are next person (after me) who encountered this issue. Maybe you
could comment (or at least +1) the bug.
On 03.07.14 09:57, Steve Bergman wrote:
What do you think woul
10 matches
Mail list logo