On Tue, 19 Aug 2014, Scott Lewis wrote:
Our sa-update's have not found fresh updates for a couple of weeks now.
Does anyone know anything about this or are experiencing the same thing?
It does not look like they are erring out.
Masscheck corpus starvation, possibly due to timing issues. We're
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014, Greg Ledford wrote:
What exactly are SA headers supposed to look like?
SA headers look like this:
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.138
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.138 tagged_above=-100 required=5
tests=[MISSING_MID=0.14, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, S
You’d be wanting:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7068
BTW, you seriously need to update SpamAssassin. In the time since that version
came out, spammers have figured out how to defeat old countermeasures and come
up with new ways to hide SPAM.
On Aug 17, 2014, at 6:47
Our sa-update's have not found fresh updates for a couple of weeks now. Does
anyone know anything about this or are experiencing the same thing? It does
not look like they are erring out.
Thanks
What exactly are SA headers supposed to look like? I’m still getting quite a
bit of spam coming through. It’s blocking quite a bit but I’m not so sure SA is
even doing its job. Is there maybe a way to just block everything from anything
.us? Stuff like this is being missed (what’s really amusin
On 15/08/14 18:54, Joe Quinn wrote:
On 8/15/2014 1:50 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Fri, 15 Aug 2014 10:39:03 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 15 Aug 2014, David F. Skoll wrote:
SPF is so easy ("v=spf1 +all")
Doing *that* should be worth a point or two by itself.
Yes. I even through
