Re: Detecting foreign language issues

2014-09-11 Thread John Hardin
On Thu, 11 Sep 2014, Alex wrote: Recently I started receiving a bunch of what I think is spam in foreign languages, most usually Russian. I can't specifically exclude foreign languages. However, much of the FNs have To: fields that do not match my domain. If my domain is example.com, how can I

Detecting foreign language issues

2014-09-11 Thread Alex
Hi, Recently I started receiving a bunch of what I think is spam in foreign languages, most usually Russian. I can't specifically exclude foreign languages. However, much of the FNs have To: fields that do not match my domain. If my domain is example.com, how can I write a rule that checks to see

Re: small bug in logging

2014-09-11 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 11.09.14 16:58, Reindl Harald wrote: not a big deal but the second line has a rounding bug or maybe it don't round but just cut the comma part precisely. however, syncing those two might e a good idea. Sep 11 16:54:46 localhost spamd[8205]: spamd: identified spam (8.0/4.5) for sa-milt:189

Re: How to report spam to mailspike

2014-09-11 Thread Marcin Mirosław
W dniu 09.09.2014 o 23:53, Jose Borges Ferreira pisze: > Hi Marcin, > > I'm affiliated with Mailspike and just want to say that we have > changed the contact form so you now have a option specify that you are > contacting as Self-employed or private. > > We have also configured ab...@mailspike.or

small bug in logging

2014-09-11 Thread Reindl Harald
not a big deal but the second line has a rounding bug or maybe it don't round but just cut the comma part Sep 11 16:54:46 localhost spamd[8205]: spamd: identified spam (8.0/4.5) for sa-milt:189. Sep 11 16:54:46 localhost spamd[8205]: spamd: result: Y 7 - BAYES_99,BAYES_999,DKIM_SIGNED

Re: bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam

2014-09-11 Thread Axb
On 09/10/2014 11:19 PM, RW wrote: On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 20:57:35 +0200 Axb wrote: > >In practice this means that, without custom rules, ham can only be > >autolearned if it hits a DNS whitelist rule or RP_MATCHES_RCVD. > > > >from what I'm seeing is that it takes lower scored ham to autolearn >

Re: RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_* strange scoring

2014-09-11 Thread Jose Borges Ferreira
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > so received nightly with sa-update? The scores are adjusted according to the corpus results there is always some bias ... >> That's the expected scoring distribution. We have in our system a more >> generous scoring ranging from -0.5 to -3.