Am 13.03.2015 um 00:06 schrieb Chris:
they definitely not aggressive, I am actually struggling to reach 5
points on most spam.
train your bayes and adjust scores in "local.cf"
we reject above 8.0 points and 99% of all junk making it through
postscreen and other filters before SA are rejected
they definitely not aggressive, I am actually struggling to reach 5
points on most spam.
On 12 March 2015 at 12:10, Reindl Harald wrote:
> please don't top post
>
> Am 12.03.2015 um 13:06 schrieb Sujit Acharyya-choudhury:
>>
>> I don't have any custom rules nor I am using sought.cf. I have chosen
On March 12, 2015 11:10:13 PM "Rick Hantz \(TirNanOg\)"
wrote:
In my user_prefs file, I have: (see resulting header below)
whitelist_from mailto:*@sailthru.com
read perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
note whitelist_from allows forged senders, if possible use whitelist_auth
instaed
On March 12, 2015 9:57:37 PM "@lbutlr" wrote:
Since the message was rejected, no, I do not have the actual message. I am
relying, at this point, on my bother having given me correct information.
Like all bothers, this is a risky assumption.
adjust reject score higther then, atleast temporary
On March 12, 2015 9:23:51 PM "@lbutlr" wrote:
On Mar 12, 2015, at 2:07 PM, @lbutlr wrote:
> But it was NOT a junk mail from yahoo, it was a message from my brother’s
yahoo account that said only “Kill it”.
Just in case I am misinterpreting something here….
try ask sender to disable html
Am 12.03.2015 um 23:06 schrieb Rick Hantz (TirNanOg):
In my user_prefs file, I have: (see resulting header below)
whitelist_from mailto:*@sailthru.com
whitelist_from mailto:*@e.washingtonpost.com
Do I also need
whitelist_from mailto:*@*.sailthru.com ?
Return-path:
i guess all that "mai
In my user_prefs file, I have: (see resulting header below)
whitelist_from mailto:*@sailthru.com
whitelist_from mailto:*@e.washingtonpost.com
Do I also need
whitelist_from mailto:*@*.sailthru.com ?
Appreciate all the help.
-RickH
Return-path:
Envelope-to: rickhan!!tirna
On Mar 12, 2015, at 2:29 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD: that is suspect - sure that you internal networks and
> trusted networks are configured correctly?
I don’t get a lot of Yahoo mail. But I do get some on the server. It doesn’t
normally hit that.
For example, a couple of min
On 3/12/2015 4:23 PM, @lbutlr wrote:
On Mar 12, 2015, at 2:07 PM, @lbutlr wrote:
But it was NOT a junk mail from yahoo, it was a message from my brother’s yahoo
account that said only “Kill it”.
Just in case I am misinterpreting something here….
Mar 11 22:28:33 mail postfix/smtpd[79324]: con
Am 12.03.2015 um 21:23 schrieb @lbutlr:
On Mar 12, 2015, at 2:07 PM, @lbutlr wrote:
But it was NOT a junk mail from yahoo, it was a message from my brother’s yahoo
account that said only “Kill it”.
>
Just in case I am misinterpreting something here….
Mar 11 22:28:33 mail postfix/smtpd[793
On Thursday 12 March 2015 at 21:07:43 (EU time), @lbutlr wrote:
> On Mar 12, 2015, at 3:36 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > what's the problem?
> > that a junk mail from yahoo is blocked?
>
> But it was NOT a junk mail from yahoo, it was a message from my brother’s
> yahoo account that said only “Ki
On Mar 12, 2015, at 2:07 PM, @lbutlr wrote:
> But it was NOT a junk mail from yahoo, it was a message from my brother’s
> yahoo account that said only “Kill it”.
Just in case I am misinterpreting something here….
Mar 11 22:28:33 mail postfix/smtpd[79324]: connect from
nm20-vm5.bullet.mail.ne1.
On Mar 12, 2015, at 3:36 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> what's the problem?
> that a junk mail from yahoo is blocked?
But it was NOT a junk mail from yahoo, it was a message from my brother’s yahoo
account that said only “Kill it”.
As far as I know, since he then sent me the message via gmail, ther
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 11:23:33 -0700
Rick Hantz \(TirNanOg\) wrote:
>
> However, none of the whitelist seems to get processed. Mail that
> should have a high negative number doesn't and ends up in the spam
> folder.
>
> whitelist_from 23andme.com
> ...
> whitelist_from *.aarp.com
try:
w
On 03/12/2015 07:23 PM, Rick Hantz (TirNanOg) wrote:
whitelist_from alfranken.com
bad syntax
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.4.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.txt
unwhitelist_from u...@example.com
Used to override a default whitelist_from entry, so for example a
distributio
Am 12.03.2015 um 19:23 schrieb Rick Hantz (TirNanOg):
My mail is hosted on Lunarpages.com on my own domain.
I train SpamAssassin frequently.
However, I get hundreds of spam messages daily (500-700). This is an old
public account that I need to maintain, otherwise I’d delete it.
After a while
My mail is hosted on Lunarpages.com on my own domain.
I train SpamAssassin frequently.
However, I get hundreds of spam messages daily (500-700). This is an old
public account that I need to maintain, otherwise I'd delete it.
After a while, the tokens files get corrupt, so I delete them and st
please don't top post
Am 12.03.2015 um 13:06 schrieb Sujit Acharyya-choudhury:
I don't have any custom rules nor I am using sought.cf. I have chosen
the standard installation without any tweaks. I am just worried,
whether I am being too aggressive in blocking messages which are not
blocked by M
I don't have any custom rules nor I am using sought.cf. I have chosen
the standard installation without any tweaks. I am just worried,
whether I am being too aggressive in blocking messages which are not
blocked by MessageLabs.
I accept the scoring method will be different.
-Original Messa
Am 12.03.2015 um 12:40 schrieb Sujit Acharyya-choudhury:
We are using MessageLabs for our most of our inward mails. However, we
also get mails from other places as well. In order to get rid of spam,
we have installed the latest version of spamassassin, which is set to
reject any mail at smtp
We are using MessageLabs for our most of our inward mails. However, we
also get mails from other places as well. In order to get rid of spam,
we have installed the latest version of spamassassin, which is set to
reject any mail at smtp time if the score is over 12. What I find
peculiar is some m
On March 12, 2015 5:53:43 AM "@lbutlr" wrote:
spamd: result: Y 10 -
DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RDNS_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,URIBL_BLACK,URIBL_DBL_SPAM,URIBL_JP_SURBL,URIBL_RHS_DOB,URIBL_SBL_A,URIBL_S
Am 12.03.2015 um 05:52 schrieb @lbutlr:
On 11 Mar 2015, at 22:45 , @lbutlr wrote:
$ grep 3l2cbk5MbNzJMhn /var/log/maillog
Mar 11 22:28:34 mail postfix/smtpd[79324]: 3l2cbk5MbNzJMhn:
client=nm20-vm5.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com[98.138.91.242]
Mar 11 22:28:34 mail postfix/cleanup[79271]: 3l2cbk
Am 12.03.2015 um 05:45 schrieb @lbutlr:
$ grep 3l2cbk5MbNzJMhn /var/log/maillog
Mar 11 22:28:34 mail postfix/smtpd[79324]: 3l2cbk5MbNzJMhn:
client=nm20-vm5.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com[98.138.91.242]
Mar 11 22:28:34 mail postfix/cleanup[79271]: 3l2cbk5MbNzJMhn:
message-id=<2c89470b-6522-413d-813b
On 03/12/2015 06:28 AM, Oli Schacher wrote:
On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 22:52:41 -0600
"@lbutlr" wrote:
Oh, found the log line seconds later:
spamd: result: Y 10 -
[...]
,URIBL_BLACK,URIBL_DBL_SPAM,URIBL_JP_SURBL,URIBL_RHS_DOB,URIBL_SBL_A,URIBL_SC_SURBL,URIBL_WS_SURBL
Looks like the message text
Am 10.03.2015 um 18:29 schrieb Lorenzo Thurman:
I have these messages in a paste: http://pastebin.com/jNQfRerx. They
were received about 1 1/2 hours apart. After I received the first one, I
ran sudo sa-learn —spam /path/to/mail/folder against it and then sudo
sa-learn —sync. spamassasin reported
26 matches
Mail list logo
