Re: blacklist_uri_host

2015-04-03 Thread @lbutlr
On Apr 3, 2015, at 6:42 AM, Joe Quinn wrote: > By the way, you can add .rocks to your list. We're doing something similar in > KAM.cf as KAM_OTHER_BAD_TLD. > I noticed that KAM.cf scored my most recent mailing from Newegg with a total of 3.7 points: 0.2 KAM_LOTSOFHASH Emails with lots

Re: blacklist_uri_host

2015-04-03 Thread Joe Acquisto-j4
Sorry if this seems newbie-ish, but . . . I just got (a) phish purporting to be a major CC and had to scroll way down the html stuff to find the phishy link. Will this address that problem? joe a. >>> Axb 04/02/15 4:25 PM >>> Gals (3?) & Guys If you're being plagued by the new TLD spams AND

Re: TO_IN_SUBJ for username?

2015-04-03 Thread John Hardin
On Fri, 3 Apr 2015, Paul Stead wrote: On 03/04/15 07:26, Niamh Holding wrote: Apparently not as there is no hit for these headers- To:ni...@fullbore.co.uk Subject: (ni...@fullbore.co.uk) Get Life Cover from just 17p per day Reply-to:n...@seventyfourthreemountainousselections.com Messag

Re: blacklist_uri_host

2015-04-03 Thread Joe Quinn
On 4/2/2015 4:23 PM, Axb wrote: Gals (3?) & Guys If you're being plagued by the new TLD spams AND using SA 3.4.x don't forget "blacklist_uri_host" per default it's scored score URI_HOST_IN_BLACKLIST 100 but you may want to be less radical and just use a score butnot treat as a poison pill rul

Re: TO_IN_SUBJ for username?

2015-04-03 Thread Paul Stead
On 03/04/15 07:26, Niamh Holding wrote: Apparently not as there is no hit for these headers- To:ni...@fullbore.co.uk Subject: (ni...@fullbore.co.uk) Get Life Cover from just 17p per day Reply-to:n...@seventyfourthreemountainousselections.com Message-ID:<8403096a57a551bf0d0088dc355de...@seventy