Le 04/06/2015 17:47, Kevin A. McGrail a écrit :
As noted, I think the users@ might welcome the information especially if
it is filterable. But someone will have to step up and work on that
script.
If someone does see the need for this and volunteer to improve the
script, perhaps it could be c
On 05/06/2015 01:38, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 6/4/2015 11:33 AM, Ben wrote:
>
>> Lack of updates seems to be to be important enough to merit a little post to
>> users@
> We'll agree to disagree but if you volunteer the time and improve
> https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cg
On Thu, 04 Jun 2015 16:33:43 +0100
Ben wrote:
>
> On 04/06/2015 16:06, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> > a lack of updates does not present a user issue. It is my opinion
> > that if an admin is concerned about rules updates, they should be
> > monitoring dev@ and/or ruleqa@.
>
> Lack of updates seem
On 6/4/2015 11:40 AM, Ben wrote:
Perhaps its time for a low-volume announce type list? You don't seem
to have one of those unless I missed it in my quick scan over your
lists page ?
We have an announce list but I don't think subscribers would expect to
get daily updates on rule updates.
As
And while I do monitor users@ for issues, a lack of updates
does not present a user issue. It is my opinion that if an admin is
concerned about rules updates, they should be monitoring dev@ and/or
ruleqa@.
Plus, let's have a look at the definitions of aforementioned lists :
Dev
Unless you a
On 6/4/2015 11:33 AM, Ben wrote:
Lack of updates seems to be to be important enough to merit a little
post to users@
We'll agree to disagree but if you volunteer the time and improve
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7121, I'm open to the
script emailing users@ instead of dev@
On 04/06/2015 16:06, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
a lack of updates does not present a user issue. It is my opinion that
if an admin is concerned about rules updates, they should be monitoring
dev@ and/or ruleqa@.
Lack of updates seems to be to be important enough to merit a little
post to users@
On 6/4/2015 10:24 AM, Jim Popovitch wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 8:08 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Updates were broken by two issues. 1st, there is a bug in svn with files
with spaces with mod svn. I introduced a file with a space while preparing
the 3.4.1 release.
Forgive me if this sounds in
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 8:08 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> Updates were broken by two issues. 1st, there is a bug in svn with files
> with spaces with mod svn. I introduced a file with a space while preparing
> the 3.4.1 release.
Forgive me if this sounds incendiary, it's not meant to be.At wh
Updates were broken by two issues. 1st, there is a bug in svn with files with
spaces with mod svn. I introduced a file with a space while preparing the
3.4.1 release.
2nd, the Svn bug caused the ruleqa server which tests rules to spiral out of
diskspace. I fixed that a few days ago.
Now t
Marc,
That is very helpful. Thank you.
Paul
From: Marc Selig
Sent: 04 June 2015 12:08
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: definition update frequency?
On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 10:25:41AM +, Osborne, Paul
(paul.osbo...@canterbury.ac.uk)
On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 10:25:41AM +, Osborne, Paul
(paul.osbo...@canterbury.ac.uk) wrote:
> I have noticed though that we have not received any definition updates from
> update.spamassassin.org channel since the 21st May with serial no: 1680203
[...]
> Can someone confirm whether updates t
Am 04.06.2015 um 12:25 schrieb Osborne, Paul
(paul.osbo...@canterbury.ac.uk):
I have been using SpamAssassin for a while on Debian Squeeze and recently
upgraded to Wheezy with the provided Spamassassin packge 3.3.2 (don't mention
Jessie!).
I have noticed though that we have not received any
Hi,
I have been using SpamAssassin for a while on Debian Squeeze and recently
upgraded to Wheezy with the provided Spamassassin packge 3.3.2 (don't mention
Jessie!).
I have noticed though that we have not received any definition updates from
update.spamassassin.org channel since the 21st May
14 matches
Mail list logo
