Re: SA Rule Tester/Checker

2015-07-18 Thread Martin Gregorie
Do you test on a production server, other (test) server, or local mbox with Mutt as your client? There are lots of possibilities. I test using a big (and growing) spam collection, which I keep so I can regression test my current rule set. Thats quite crude: if everything in the collection is

Re: BODY_URI_ONLY: False-Positive

2015-07-18 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 12.07.2015 um 16:38 schrieb RW: On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 16:22:09 +0200 Reindl Harald wrote: What I don't get is where the URI is. i guess the mailaddress Reply to: @*** That'll be it on the other hand that one did not hit it while save the message as eml and pass it

Re: SA Rule Tester/Checker

2015-07-18 Thread am
On 2015-07-18 04:54, Martin Gregorie wrote: There are lots of possibilities. I test using a big (and growing) spam collection, which I keep so I can regression test my current rule set. Thats quite crude: if everything in the collection is recognised as spam, nothing gets flagged up during the

phishing_reply_addresses list

2015-07-18 Thread Alex
Hi, Anyone know what happened to the phishing_reply_addresses list? It appears that the sourceforge site that was hosting it has been unreachable for a few days. https://aper.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/aper/phishing_reply_addresses I thought someone might know of another way to obtain it?