On Tue, 2015-08-11 at 19:23 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 11.08.2015 um 19:17 schrieb Martin Skjöldebrand:
> > On Tue, 2015-08-11 at 14:10 +0200, Martin Skjöldebrand wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2015-08-11 at 10:09 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > >
> > > > than fix /etc/passwd and give that user a sehl
Am 11.08.2015 um 19:17 schrieb Martin Skjöldebrand:
On Tue, 2015-08-11 at 14:10 +0200, Martin Skjöldebrand wrote:
On Tue, 2015-08-11 at 10:09 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
than fix /etc/passwd and give that user a sehll (as i did for
spamass-milter user on Fedora), after that you can "su - debi
On Tue, 2015-08-11 at 14:10 +0200, Martin Skjöldebrand wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-08-11 at 10:09 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> > than fix /etc/passwd and give that user a sehll (as i did for
> > spamass-milter user on Fedora), after that you can "su - debian
> > -spamd"
> > or just use http://wiki.
Hai!
SURBL looks at the importance of the site. Is it lets for example a phishing
page on a large isp we will not blacklist the whole isp. Too much collateral
damage.
SURBL has also a non RBL product for this called UriQ. Specificly for full uri
lookups (eg also hacked and phishing pages) tha
Am 11.08.2015 um 15:41 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
Reindl Harald skrev den 2015-08-11 15:29:
Am 11.08.2015 um 15:26 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
anyone know where one is ?
i fear all i have is for rfc 4408 :/
http://www.openspf.net/Why?s=mfrom;id=m...@junc.eu;ip=176.58.121.172
if the SPF is invalid
Reindl Harald skrev den 2015-08-11 15:29:
Am 11.08.2015 um 15:26 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
anyone know where one is ?
i fear all i have is for rfc 4408 :/
http://www.openspf.net/Why?s=mfrom;id=m...@junc.eu;ip=176.58.121.172
if the SPF is invalid or there would be warnings you would see them
t
Am 11.08.2015 um 15:26 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
anyone know where one is ?
i fear all i have is for rfc 4408 :/
http://www.openspf.net/Why?s=mfrom;id=m...@junc.eu;ip=176.58.121.172
if the SPF is invalid or there would be warnings you would see them there
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
anyone know where one is ?
i fear all i have is for rfc 4408 :/
Unfortunately, most of the phishes are under many layers of the main domain.
Google, Web of Trust (WOT) and many other virus scanner seem to find it, as
was rightly pointed out SaneSecurity's signatures of Phishtank. So as far
as phishes we are getting, so far it has not being proved to be very us
On Tue, 2015-08-11 at 13:19 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> this just cays how spamd runs (user debian-spamd), but how do you
> connect
> your mail system to spamassassin?
> Seems I should have been cleared in former message
>
> and please don't send me personal replies - I read the list
On Tue, 2015-08-11 at 10:09 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> than fix /etc/passwd and give that user a sehll (as i did for
> spamass-milter user on Fedora), after that you can "su - debian
> -spamd"
> or just use http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SiteWideBayesSetup
I've changed my configuration
Am 11.08.2015 um 14:02 schrieb Sujit Acharyya-choudhury:
The URIBL_PH_SURBL is actually not very useful. I have checked a real
phishing site with SURBL and it shows clean in SURBL - I think, SURBL only
looks at the part of the domain.
every URIBL check only tests the main-domain of a link, t
The URIBL_PH_SURBL is actually not very useful. I have checked a real
phishing site with SURBL and it shows clean in SURBL - I think, SURBL only
looks at the part of the domain.
-Original Message-
From: RW [mailto:rwmailli...@googlemail.com]
Sent: 11 August 2015 12:57
To: users@spamassas
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 11:11:56 +
Sujit Acharyya-choudhury wrote:
> I have seen lot of Phishes submitted in Phishtank.com and yet there
> is no rule to check Phishtank.com.
There is via URIBL_PH_SURBL. It doesn't score much though.
On Tue, 2015-08-11 at 09:06 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
2. how do you run SA? If you are using amavis or other system that
uses
single account for scoring, you must train that account
On 11.08.15 10:04, Martin Skjöldebrand wrote:
This is the output of ps aux | grep spamd
root 21
Many thanks for the info.
-Original Message-
From: Reindl Harald [mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net]
Sent: 11 August 2015 12:14
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Phishtank and SpamAssassin
Am 11.08.2015 um 13:11 schrieb Sujit Acharyya-choudhury:
> I have seen lot of Phishes sub
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 10:04:41 +0200
Martin Skjöldebrand wrote:
> The main instance is running as root, (and sa-learn has been run as
> root) but the children are run as debian-spamd but I can't "su" to
> that user, I'm still root.
Use su -m
Am 11.08.2015 um 13:11 schrieb Sujit Acharyya-choudhury:
I have seen lot of Phishes submitted in Phishtank.com and yet there is
no rule to check Phishtank.com. Would it be a good idea to give some
points to phishes submitted to phishtank – even if they are not verified?
that's way better plac
I have seen lot of Phishes submitted in Phishtank.com and yet there is no
rule to check Phishtank.com. Would it be a good idea to give some points to
phishes submitted to phishtank - even if they are not verified?
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Am 11.08.2015 um 10:04 schrieb Martin Skjöldebrand:
On Tue, 2015-08-11 at 09:06 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
2. how do you run SA? If you are using amavis or other system that
uses
single account for scoring, you must train that account
This is the output of ps aux | grep spamd
roo
On Tue, 2015-08-11 at 09:06 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> 2. how do you run SA? If you are using amavis or other system that
> uses
> single account for scoring, you must train that account
This is the output of ps aux | grep spamd
root 21807 0.0 1.9 170008 80528 ?Ss 06
On Tue, 2015-08-11 at 09:06 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 11.08.15 07:05, Martin Skjöldebrand wrote:
> > I've run sa-learn on my spam folder (containing over 700 mails) and
> > random ham folder (at least as much). And still a horrible amount
> > of
> > UCE (mainly loans and gambling s
On 11.08.15 07:05, Martin Skjöldebrand wrote:
I've run sa-learn on my spam folder (containing over 700 mails) and
random ham folder (at least as much). And still a horrible amount of
UCE (mainly loans and gambling sites, is it a conspiracy? =) ) are
allowed through with a score of 2.4 or somethin
23 matches
Mail list logo
