Re: Learning only on read emails?

2015-10-21 Thread Ryan Coleman
I figured out a way to get the spamd user to scan the spam folders. Definitely helping. applying email in the inbox that have been read to the HAM is next on the list. > On Oct 20, 2015, at 9:39 AM, RW wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 08:29:27 -0500 > Ryan Coleman wrote: > >> >>> On Oct 20, 2

Re: Misbehaving HEADER_HOST_IN_BLACKLIST? And no SPF on SA list host?

2015-10-21 Thread Amir Caspi
On Oct 21, 2015, at 7:34 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > I want to run the samples you provided and see if I can duplicate the issue > but it definitely sounds odd. I've got four more of them, if you want. (Includes a reply to one of the spamples, a separate two-message thread, and another sing

Re: spf records and cnames

2015-10-21 Thread Dianne Skoll
On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 00:59:04 +0200 Reindl Harald wrote: > so *read* what i refer to and read it really > YOU SET THE SPF AS ANY OTHER RECORD TYPE FOR A CNAME IMPLICITLY BY DO > THAT FOR THE A-RECORD THE CNAME IS POINTING TO You don't need to yell. A CNAME does not point to an A record. Regard

Re: Misbehaving HEADER_HOST_IN_BLACKLIST? And no SPF on SA list host?

2015-10-21 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
I want to run the samples you provided and see if I can duplicate the issue but it definitely sounds odd. Regards, KAM On October 20, 2015 11:39:36 AM PDT, Amir Caspi wrote: >On Oct 19, 2015, at 1:16 PM, RW wrote: > >> body URI_HOST_IN_BLACKLISTeval:check_uri_host_in_blacklist() >> header

Re: spf records and cnames

2015-10-21 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 22.10.2015 um 00:19 schrieb Reindl Harald: Am 22.10.2015 um 00:08 schrieb Bill Cole: On 21 Oct 2015, at 13:48, btb wrote: are spf records allowed to be a cname? I can't see any reason why they shouldn't be... e.g.: http://dpaste.com/0MR0R3C.txt is this explicitly addressed in an rf

Re: spf records and cnames

2015-10-21 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 22.10.2015 um 00:26 schrieb Dianne Skoll: On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 00:19:05 +0200 Reindl Harald wrote: no it should NOT otherwise you would not be able to set a SPF-record for your CNAMES You can't do that anyway. If a domain has a CNAME record, it MUST NOT have any other records of any

Re: spf records and cnames

2015-10-21 Thread Dianne Skoll
On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 00:19:05 +0200 Reindl Harald wrote: > no it should NOT > otherwise you would not be able to set a SPF-record for your CNAMES You can't do that anyway. If a domain has a CNAME record, it MUST NOT have any other records of any other type whatsoever. So there's no way to set

Re: spf records and cnames

2015-10-21 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 22.10.2015 um 00:08 schrieb Bill Cole: On 21 Oct 2015, at 13:48, btb wrote: are spf records allowed to be a cname? I can't see any reason why they shouldn't be... e.g.: http://dpaste.com/0MR0R3C.txt is this explicitly addressed in an rfc? I don't believe so and there's no reason to.

Re: spf records and cnames

2015-10-21 Thread Bill Cole
On 21 Oct 2015, at 13:48, btb wrote: are spf records allowed to be a cname? I can't see any reason why they shouldn't be... e.g.: http://dpaste.com/0MR0R3C.txt is this explicitly addressed in an rfc? I don't believe so and there's no reason to. CNAME records trump all DNS record types f

Re: spf records and cnames

2015-10-21 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 21.10.2015 um 19:48 schrieb btb: are spf records allowed to be a cname? e.g.: http://dpaste.com/0MR0R3C.txt is this explicitly addressed in an rfc? a CNAME is always followed, hence you can't mix CNAME and other ressource types, in other words: yes otherwise you would need a SPF recor

Re: spf records and cnames

2015-10-21 Thread Benny Pedersen
On October 21, 2015 7:49:06 PM btb wrote: http://dpaste.com/0MR0R3C.txt https://dmarcian.com/spf-survey/email.instantbusinessresources.com is this explicitly addressed in an rfc? dont know, aslong spf is valid, then its ok

spf records and cnames

2015-10-21 Thread btb
are spf records allowed to be a cname? e.g.: http://dpaste.com/0MR0R3C.txt is this explicitly addressed in an rfc? thanks -ben

Re: SpamAssassin Rules Regarding Abuse of New Top Level Domains

2015-10-21 Thread Paul Stead
On 20/10/15 21:10, Axb wrote: On 10/20/2015 10:04 PM, RW wrote: On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 13:29:45 -0500 (CDT) sha...@shanew.net wrote: I already have rules that score for these tlds in received or envelope from, but I'm getting tired of making the regular expression longer and longer (in two diff