perl -p -i -e 's/__/T_/g' /usr/share/spamassassin/updates_spamassassin_org/*
This converts the rules. I'm doing something very interesting. It's
going to take a few days to see if it works.
I'm applying the same techniques of my evolution filter to the SA rule
names.
I extract the names and
On 2016-02-03 04:16, Marc Perkel wrote:
Never mind
are you elvis fan ? :=)
I found that if I change __ to T_ that it does what I want.
it does ?
note:
__ have no score need
T_ must have socre, if not defined it defults to 1.0
so did you try reading one of elvis records here:
perldo
You can do that but it requires editing all your rule files, altho then
you see those matches in all your reports.
If you just want to test one particular message, just use the -D option to
spamassassin and grep for ' got hit: '
Mar 11 21:51:44.203 [5074] dbg: rules: ran header rule __MIME_VE
Never mind
I found that if I change __ to T_ that it does what I want.
On 02/02/16 18:05, Marc Perkel wrote:
On 02/02/16 17:55, Marc Perkel wrote:
Normally SA creates a header that has a list of the names of rules
that matched. It skips the listing of hidden rules that start with __ .
On 02/02/16 17:55, Marc Perkel wrote:
Normally SA creates a header that has a list of the names of rules
that matched. It skips the listing of hidden rules that start with __ .
Is there a command where I can easily tell SA to include the hidden
rules in the report in the headers so I can see
Normally SA creates a header that has a list of the names of rules that
matched. It skips the listing of hidden rules that start with __ .
Is there a command where I can easily tell SA to include the hidden
rules in the report in the headers so I can see all of it?
--
Marc Perkel - Sales/Supp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 02-02-16 18:20, @lbutlr wrote:
> So it seems that no one uses spamassassin -d to remove markup for
> spam messages reclassified as ham?
>
> OK, I can work with that.
>
> The trouble with using formail/procmail is that the "mailbox
> timestamp" f
So it seems that no one uses spamassassin -d to remove markup for spam messages
reclassified as ham?
OK, I can work with that.
The trouble with using formail/procmail is that the "mailbox timestamp" for the
message will change, but i’ll cobble together a procmailrc to feed to formail
and see h
Am 02.02.2016 um 17:46 schrieb @lbutlr:
That’s interesting, but what the user means by “spam tagging” is the subject
tagging and the message attachment
with a sane configuration it would not be a attachment but headers
eaisly to strip with "formail" and replace the subject-tagging should be
On Tue Feb 02 2016 09:36:12 Martin Gregorie said:
>
> On Tue, 2016-02-02 at 09:10 -0700, @lbutlr wrote:
>> When a user moves a message from the spam box to the not spam box i
>> have a script that learns that message as ham, however, the user
>> would like it if the tagging of the message was
Am 02.02.2016 um 17:33 schrieb @lbutlr:
On 02 Feb 2016, at 09:19, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
@lbutlr kirjoitti 2.2.2016 18:10:
When a user moves a message from the spam box to the not spam box i
have a script that learns that message as ham, however, the user would
like it if the tagging of the
On Tue, 2016-02-02 at 09:10 -0700, @lbutlr wrote:
> When a user moves a message from the spam box to the not spam box i
> have a script that learns that message as ham, however, the user
> would like it if the tagging of the message was removed in the
> process.
>
I do something similar when I add
On 02 Feb 2016, at 09:19, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> @lbutlr kirjoitti 2.2.2016 18:10:
>> When a user moves a message from the spam box to the not spam box i
>> have a script that learns that message as ham, however, the user would
>> like it if the tagging of the message was removed in the process
@lbutlr kirjoitti 2.2.2016 18:10:
When a user moves a message from the spam box to the not spam box i
have a script that learns that message as ham, however, the user would
like it if the tagging of the message was removed in the process.
spamassassin -d doesn’t seem the right tool since I think
When a user moves a message from the spam box to the not spam box i have a
script that learns that message as ham, however, the user would like it if the
tagging of the message was removed in the process.
spamassassin -d doesn’t seem the right tool since I think I need to write the
unmarked-up
15 matches
Mail list logo
