Re: regex help

2016-02-22 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 22.02.2016 um 12:45 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas: Am 21.02.2016 um 19:08 schrieb RW: [90-100] represents a single character. You are specifying 9 or the range 0-1 with two redundant 0 characters on the end. If you meant 90 to 100 inclusive, you need something like: '^127\.0\.4\.(9[0-9]|

Re: How to test TxRep?

2016-02-22 Thread RW
On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:10:36 + Martin Puppe wrote: > Hello, > > I have activated TxRep in v341.pre. But did did you turn it on with use_txrep 1 > But how do I verify that it > actually does anything? There should be a dynamically scored rule called TXREP

Re: regex help

2016-02-22 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Am 21.02.2016 um 19:08 schrieb RW: [90-100] represents a single character. You are specifying 9 or the range 0-1 with two redundant 0 characters on the end. If you meant 90 to 100 inclusive, you need something like: '^127\.0\.4\.(9[0-9]|100)$' On 21.02.16 19:20, Reindl Harald wrote: thans, ac

How to test TxRep?

2016-02-22 Thread Martin Puppe
Hello, I have activated TxRep in v341.pre. But how do I verify that it actually does anything? First of all, where does it store its database? When I do `spamassassin --add-addr-to-whitelist=fri...@ham.org`, where does this information go? Basically, I cannot confirm that TxRep has any effect a

Re: Test results differ when input from MTA vs spamc cmdline

2016-02-22 Thread Tino de Bruijn
> On 15 Feb 2016, at 02:12, John Hardin wrote: > > On Sun, 14 Feb 2016, RW wrote: > >> On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 12:22:36 +0800 >> Tino de Bruijn wrote: >> >>> I have some trouble filtering my spam, as everything I try from the >>> commandline works fine (spamc -t < spam.eml , where spam.eml is a >>