Hi ,does anyone know something about this ?
Use of uninitialized value in lc at
/usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/PDFInfo.pm line 418
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München
Sitz der Gesellschaft:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, RW wrote:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 13:58:03 -0800 (PST)
John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Steve wrote:
b) Configure spamc -C report (run as any user) to initiate
training of the amavis bayes database (in ~amavis/.spamassassin) ?
That would probably be a code change,
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 13:58:03 -0800 (PST)
John Hardin wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Steve wrote:
> > b) Configure spamc -C report (run as any user) to initiate
> > training of the amavis bayes database (in ~amavis/.spamassassin) ?
>
> That would probably be a code change, unless you want to
Am 25.02.2016 um 22:58 schrieb John Hardin:
b) Configure spamc -C report (run as any user) to initiate training
of the amavis bayes database (in ~amavis/.spamassassin) ?
That would probably be a code change, unless you want to write a wrapped
script that calls the real spamc and then
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Steve wrote:
Please keep the discussion on-list so others may help/benefit.
On 25/02/2016 01:14, John Hardin wrote:
The second one has autolearn=yes, so I would say that autolearn is
probably the cause of this behavior.
You're right... Manual training wasn't working -
On 24 Feb 2016, at 20:14, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Steve wrote:
On 24/02/2016 22:59, John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016, Steve wrote:
> I've used spamassassin for many years - on Ubuntu, using amvisd -
with > great success. In recent months, I've been receiving
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Bill Cole wrote:
On 25 Feb 2016, at 11:42, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Bill Cole wrote:
> I haven't had much time for analysis of this yet and likely will not
> today , but last night's update is missing a number of 'describe' lines
> (e.g.
On 25 Feb 2016, at 11:42, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Bill Cole wrote:
I haven't had much time for analysis of this yet and likely will not
today , but last night's update is missing a number of 'describe'
lines (e.g. TO_NO_BRKTS_HTML_ONLY, TVD_FROM_1) previously in
On 25-2-2016 17:56, Kevin Golding wrote:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 16:47:05 -, bOnK
wrote:
I'm using bayes_sql_override_username.
Mysql userpref:
@example.combayes_sql_override_usernameSomeName
Table bayes_vars uses SomeName for all users
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 16:47:05 -, bOnK
wrote:
I'm using bayes_sql_override_username.
Mysql userpref:
@example.combayes_sql_override_usernameSomeName
Table bayes_vars uses SomeName for all users @example.com,
but txrep seems to ignore this
Am 25.02.2016 um 17:47 schrieb bOnK:
I'm using bayes_sql_override_username.
Mysql userpref:
@example.combayes_sql_override_usernameSomeName
Table bayes_vars uses SomeName for all users @example.com,
but txrep seems to ignore this setting and uses u...@example.com
Am I mistaken in
I'm using bayes_sql_override_username.
Mysql userpref:
@example.combayes_sql_override_usernameSomeName
Table bayes_vars uses SomeName for all users @example.com,
but txrep seems to ignore this setting and uses u...@example.com
Am I mistaken in thinking txrep should use
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Bill Cole wrote:
I haven't had much time for analysis of this yet and likely will not today ,
but last night's update is missing a number of 'describe' lines (e.g.
TO_NO_BRKTS_HTML_ONLY, TVD_FROM_1) previously in 72_active.cf.
Someone with more than 10 minutes to spare
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 00:41:04 +
Steve wrote:
> On 24/02/2016 22:59, John Hardin wrote:
> > How do you train your Bayes? Autolearn? General user submissions?
> > Trusted user submissions? Only you, from only your personal mail?
> Only my personal mailbox *really* matters to me. I train
I haven't had much time for analysis of this yet and likely will not
today , but last night's update is missing a number of 'describe' lines
(e.g. TO_NO_BRKTS_HTML_ONLY, TVD_FROM_1) previously in 72_active.cf.
Someone with more than 10 minutes to spare today and clues about the
rules update
On 2016-02-24 18:01, John Hardin wrote:
Markus, I think this is a valid issue, I think you should file a bug.
I just opened
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7300
but the tracker shows 774 bug status NEW with the oldest dating back to
2007.
If the tracker is still activly
16 matches
Mail list logo