PDFInfo.pm line 418

2016-02-25 Thread Robert Schetterer
Hi ,does anyone know something about this ? Use of uninitialized value in lc at /usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/PDFInfo.pm line 418 Best Regards MfG Robert Schetterer -- [*] sys4 AG http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64 Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München Sitz der Gesellschaft:

Re: Spamassassin Bayes... "why give that spam that score???"

2016-02-25 Thread John Hardin
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, RW wrote: On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 13:58:03 -0800 (PST) John Hardin wrote: On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Steve wrote: b) Configure spamc -C report (run as any user) to initiate training of the amavis bayes database (in ~amavis/.spamassassin) ? That would probably be a code change,

Re: Spamassassin Bayes... "why give that spam that score???"

2016-02-25 Thread RW
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 13:58:03 -0800 (PST) John Hardin wrote: > On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Steve wrote: > > b) Configure spamc -C report (run as any user) to initiate > > training of the amavis bayes database (in ~amavis/.spamassassin) ? > > That would probably be a code change, unless you want to

Re: Spamassassin Bayes... "why give that spam that score???"

2016-02-25 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 25.02.2016 um 22:58 schrieb John Hardin: b) Configure spamc -C report (run as any user) to initiate training of the amavis bayes database (in ~amavis/.spamassassin) ? That would probably be a code change, unless you want to write a wrapped script that calls the real spamc and then

Re: Spamassassin Bayes... "why give that spam that score???"

2016-02-25 Thread John Hardin
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Steve wrote: Please keep the discussion on-list so others may help/benefit. On 25/02/2016 01:14, John Hardin wrote: The second one has autolearn=yes, so I would say that autolearn is probably the cause of this behavior. You're right... Manual training wasn't working -

Re: Spamassassin Bayes... "why give that spam that score???"

2016-02-25 Thread Bill Cole
On 24 Feb 2016, at 20:14, John Hardin wrote: On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Steve wrote: On 24/02/2016 22:59, John Hardin wrote: On Wed, 24 Feb 2016, Steve wrote: > I've used spamassassin for many years - on Ubuntu, using amvisd - with > great success. In recent months, I've been receiving

Re: Rules UPDATE version 1732039 IS BROKEN

2016-02-25 Thread John Hardin
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Bill Cole wrote: On 25 Feb 2016, at 11:42, John Hardin wrote: On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Bill Cole wrote: > I haven't had much time for analysis of this yet and likely will not > today , but last night's update is missing a number of 'describe' lines > (e.g.

Rules UPDATE version 1732039 IS BROKEN

2016-02-25 Thread Bill Cole
On 25 Feb 2016, at 11:42, John Hardin wrote: On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Bill Cole wrote: I haven't had much time for analysis of this yet and likely will not today , but last night's update is missing a number of 'describe' lines (e.g. TO_NO_BRKTS_HTML_ONLY, TVD_FROM_1) previously in

Re: txrep and bayes_sql_override_username

2016-02-25 Thread bOnK
On 25-2-2016 17:56, Kevin Golding wrote: On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 16:47:05 -, bOnK wrote: I'm using bayes_sql_override_username. Mysql userpref: @example.combayes_sql_override_usernameSomeName Table bayes_vars uses SomeName for all users

Re: txrep and bayes_sql_override_username

2016-02-25 Thread Kevin Golding
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 16:47:05 -, bOnK wrote: I'm using bayes_sql_override_username. Mysql userpref: @example.combayes_sql_override_usernameSomeName Table bayes_vars uses SomeName for all users @example.com, but txrep seems to ignore this

Re: txrep and bayes_sql_override_username

2016-02-25 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 25.02.2016 um 17:47 schrieb bOnK: I'm using bayes_sql_override_username. Mysql userpref: @example.combayes_sql_override_usernameSomeName Table bayes_vars uses SomeName for all users @example.com, but txrep seems to ignore this setting and uses u...@example.com Am I mistaken in

txrep and bayes_sql_override_username

2016-02-25 Thread bOnK
I'm using bayes_sql_override_username. Mysql userpref: @example.combayes_sql_override_usernameSomeName Table bayes_vars uses SomeName for all users @example.com, but txrep seems to ignore this setting and uses u...@example.com Am I mistaken in thinking txrep should use

Re: CALL FOR HELP: Rules UPDATE version 1732039 *may* be broken

2016-02-25 Thread John Hardin
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Bill Cole wrote: I haven't had much time for analysis of this yet and likely will not today , but last night's update is missing a number of 'describe' lines (e.g. TO_NO_BRKTS_HTML_ONLY, TVD_FROM_1) previously in 72_active.cf. Someone with more than 10 minutes to spare

Re: Spamassassin Bayes... "why give that spam that score???"

2016-02-25 Thread RW
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 00:41:04 + Steve wrote: > On 24/02/2016 22:59, John Hardin wrote: > > How do you train your Bayes? Autolearn? General user submissions? > > Trusted user submissions? Only you, from only your personal mail? > Only my personal mailbox *really* matters to me. I train

CALL FOR HELP: Rules UPDATE version 1732039 *may* be broken

2016-02-25 Thread Bill Cole
I haven't had much time for analysis of this yet and likely will not today , but last night's update is missing a number of 'describe' lines (e.g. TO_NO_BRKTS_HTML_ONLY, TVD_FROM_1) previously in 72_active.cf. Someone with more than 10 minutes to spare today and clues about the rules update

Re: Parsing of address headers in spamassassin ($pms->get('From:name'))

2016-02-25 Thread Benning, Markus
On 2016-02-24 18:01, John Hardin wrote: Markus, I think this is a valid issue, I think you should file a bug. I just opened https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7300 but the tracker shows 774 bug status NEW with the oldest dating back to 2007. If the tracker is still activly