On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, Charles Sprickman wrote:
My concern with disabling autolearn is that then I’m the only one
training. My spam probably looks like everyone else’s, but my ham is
very different, lots list traffic and such.
You can still have your users provide misses for training, you'd ju
Am 29.02.2016 um 21:05 schrieb Charles Sprickman:
On Feb 29, 2016, at 4:23 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 29.02.2016 um 06:24 schrieb Charles Sprickman:
I’ve not had much luck with Bayes - when I had it enabled recently on a
per-user basis it was just hitting the master DB server too hard with
> On Feb 29, 2016, at 4:23 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 29.02.2016 um 06:24 schrieb Charles Sprickman:
>> I’ve not had much luck with Bayes - when I had it enabled recently on a
>> per-user basis it was just hitting the master DB server too hard with udpates
>
> just make a sitewide b
Am 29.02.2016 um 17:57 schrieb John Hardin:
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
20160228: Spam or ham is below threshold of 150,000:
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?daterev=20160228
20160228: Spam: 108401, Ham: 191807
Masscheck is spam-starved again, rules updates will be s
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
20160228: Spam or ham is below threshold of 150,000:
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?daterev=20160228
20160228: Spam: 108401, Ham: 191807
Masscheck is spam-starved again, rules updates will be spotty or
nonexistent this week.
--
John H
On 2/28/2016 2:18 PM, Roman Gelfand wrote:
The message header is showing
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_99,BAYES_999,
DCC_CHECK,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_MESSAGE,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2
When running the fo
Am 29.02.2016 um 06:24 schrieb Charles Sprickman:
I’ve not had much luck with Bayes - when I had it enabled recently on a
per-user basis it was just hitting the master DB server too hard with udpates
just make a sitewide bayes
(https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SiteWideBayesSetup) withou
On 29-02-16 06:24, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Recently I occasionally get bursts of spam that slips through Postfix
> (postscreen BL checks, protocol checks) and SpamAssassin. I just had
> another big jump in the last week. This was mostly spam touting Oil
> Changes, SUV sales and
