On Apr 28, 2016, at 2:30 PM, RW wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:58:47 -0600
> @lbutlr wrote:
>
>
>>> do you see any DCC_CHECK in spam headers?
>>
>> A few, but they always seem to be “1.1”
>
> What were you expecting? Like almost all SA rules it has a fixed score.
Since the daily log line
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:08 PM, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just noticed I have the following warnings in my mail logs:
>
> Apr 27 01:41:14 mail01 amavis[12700]: (12700-06) _WARN: rules: failed
> to run TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_NAME_LONG test, skipping:\n\t(Can't call method
> "_mimeheader_eval_TVD_FW
On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:58:47 -0600
@lbutlr wrote:
> > do you see any DCC_CHECK in spam headers?
>
> A few, but they always seem to be “1.1”
What were you expecting? Like almost all SA rules it has a fixed score.
> and they occur in about a third of the messages in the Spam folder,
In the
> On Apr 28, 2016, at 2:34 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
> On 27.04.16 18:38, @lbutlr wrote:
>> I have DCC setup and enabled in SpamAssasin, but the only thing I see logged
>> in maillog each day is:
>>
>> 00:00:00 mail dccifd[7397]: 1.3.158 detected 0 spam, ignored for 0, rejected
>> f
On 27.04.16 18:38, @lbutlr wrote:
I have DCC setup and enabled in SpamAssasin, but the only thing I see logged in
maillog each day is:
00:00:00 mail dccifd[7397]: 1.3.158 detected 0 spam, ignored for 0, rejected for 0,
and discarded for 0 targets among 0 total messages for targets
which appe
This is what I block:
(bid|book|click|club|cricket|date|democrat|directory|download|faith|help|link|ninja|party|press|pro|racing|reviews?|rocks|science|site|social|space|top|uno|webcam|website|work|win|xyz)
I will add some from what you have posting, thanks.
Sergio
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 5:39