Re: SPF should always hit? SOLVED

2016-07-11 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 11.07.2016 um 21:02 schrieb David B Funk: On Mon, 11 Jul 2016, Reindl Harald wrote: SA has also a weakness or design mistake here "envelope_sender_header X-Local-Envelope-From" while that header comes from postfix with customized configuration because we use it in own rules has no fallback

Re: SPF should always hit? SOLVED

2016-07-11 Thread David B Funk
On Mon, 11 Jul 2016, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 11.07.2016 um 19:30 schrieb RW: [snip..] It sounds like SA is not able to parse the envelope sender out of the headers. See the description for envelope_sender_header in man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf SA has also a weakness or design mistake here

Re: SPF should always hit? SOLVED

2016-07-11 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 11.07.2016 um 19:30 schrieb RW: On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 12:49:04 -0400 Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: I finally was able to get SPF checks to be more reliable by making sure Postfix SPF policies were in place. Here is a good read https://github.com/mail-in-a-box/mailinabox/issues/698 Excerpt:

Re: SPF should always hit? SOLVED

2016-07-11 Thread RW
On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 12:49:04 -0400 Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: > I finally was able to get SPF checks to be more reliable by making > sure Postfix SPF policies were in place. Here is a good read > > https://github.com/mail-in-a-box/mailinabox/issues/698 > Excerpt: It's worth noting that lack o

Re: SPF should always hit? SOLVED

2016-07-11 Thread Robert Fitzpatrick
Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: Joe Quinn wrote: On 6/9/2016 11:23 AM, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: Excuse me if this is too lame a question, but I have the SPF plugin enabled and it hits a lot. Should SPF_ something hit on every message if the domain has an SPF record in DNS? Furthermore, a message fo

Re: spamd: dns: new_dns_packet: a domain name contains a null label

2016-07-11 Thread Axb
Bug 7156 Bug 7104 Bug 6896 On 07/11/2016 01:42 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Reindl Harald kirjoitti 11.7.2016 14:34: Am 11.07.2016 um 13:27 schrieb Jari Fredriksson: Reindl Harald kirjoitti 11.7.2016 11:52: Am 11.07.2016 um 10:02 schrieb Jari

Re: spamd: dns: new_dns_packet: a domain name contains a null label

2016-07-11 Thread RW
On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 17:08:32 +0200 Reindl Harald wrote: > Jul 8 10:00:40 mail-gw spamd[14221]: dns: new_dns_packet > (domain=www..windstrom.at. type=A class=IN) failed: a domain name > contains a null label > > i guess that was a typo in the mail itself - shouldn't SA replace > such accidents

Re: spamd: dns: new_dns_packet: a domain name contains a null label

2016-07-11 Thread Jari Fredriksson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Reindl Harald kirjoitti 11.7.2016 14:34: > Am 11.07.2016 um 13:27 schrieb Jari Fredriksson: >> Reindl Harald kirjoitti 11.7.2016 11:52: >>> Am 11.07.2016 um 10:02 schrieb Jari Fredriksson: Define correctly, please. >> >>> "www..windstrom.at" is o

Re: spamd: dns: new_dns_packet: a domain name contains a null label

2016-07-11 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 11.07.2016 um 13:27 schrieb Jari Fredriksson: Reindl Harald kirjoitti 11.7.2016 11:52: Am 11.07.2016 um 10:02 schrieb Jari Fredriksson: Define correctly, please. "www..windstrom.at" is obvious wrong and was meant as "www.windstrom.at", so fix that typo in the background or just ignore t

Re: spamd: dns: new_dns_packet: a domain name contains a null label

2016-07-11 Thread Jari Fredriksson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Reindl Harald kirjoitti 11.7.2016 11:52: > Am 11.07.2016 um 10:02 schrieb Jari Fredriksson: >> Define correctly, please. > > "www..windstrom.at" is obvious wrong and was meant as > "www.windstrom.at", so fix that typo in the background or just ignore

Re: spamd: dns: new_dns_packet: a domain name contains a null label

2016-07-11 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 11.07.2016 um 10:02 schrieb Jari Fredriksson: Define correctly, please. "www..windstrom.at" is obvious wrong and was meant as "www.windstrom.at", so fix that typo in the background or just ignore the url at all since it CAN NOT become a positive dns response 10. heinäkuuta 2016 18.08.

Re: spamd: dns: new_dns_packet: a domain name contains a null label

2016-07-11 Thread Jari Fredriksson
Define correctly, please. 10. heinäkuuta 2016 18.08.32 GMT+03:00 Reindl Harald kirjoitti: >Jul 8 10:00:40 mail-gw spamd[14221]: dns: new_dns_packet >(domain=www..windstrom.at. type=A class=IN) failed: a domain name >contains a null label > >i guess that was a typo in the mail itself - shouldn