On Wed, 2017-01-25 at 22:29 -0800, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2017-01-26 01:03, RW wrote:
>
> >
> > Probably what's happening is that these are emails over 500 kB
> > which
> > by default are just passed through by spamc without sending them to
> > spamd. If they don't get sent to spamd the exist
On 01/26/2017 02:53 PM, David Jones wrote:
>
> I understand what their SPF record means and how it works
> but what they are publishing in their SPF record is not common.
> Normally this would expand out to a list of IPs and CIDRs or DNS
> records that can be turned into IPs that postwhite can us
On Thu, 26 Jan 2017, John Stimson wrote:
I am running SpamAssassin 3.4.1. It is running as a background daemon,
started with:
/usr/bin/spamd -d --allow-tell
Incoming mail is accepted by postfix 3.1 and submitted via the milter
interface to spamass-milter 0.40 for processing in SpamAssassin.
On 26.01.17 19:53, David Jones wrote:
I understand what their SPF record means and how it works
but what they are publishing in their SPF record is not common.
Normally this would expand out to a list of IPs and CIDRs or DNS
records that can be turned into IPs that postwhite can use to build
a l
Following up on myself:
> IMO, the SPF spec should have specified that a PTR mechanism MUST be
> ignored nuless FCrDNS matches. (Maybe it does... too lazy to look it
> up. :))
Indeed, the SPF spec does say this. So a PTR mechanism isn't completely
useless after all.
Regards,
Dianne.
On Thu, 26 Jan 2017 19:53:42 +
David Jones wrote:
> I think they publish their SPF like this because they have no good
> list of outbound mail servers themselves so they take the lazy
> approach.
Yahoo invented (or was one of the main inventors) of DKIM, so it could
also be a little bit of N
>On 01/26/2017 01:29 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> SPF_NEUTRAL will NEVER hit SPF_PASS and that's the problem with ?all
>>
>SPF mechanisms are evaluated in order, and each one has a result type
>associated with it. The default result is "+" for "pass". Another type
>of result is "?" for "neutral
On Thu, 26 Jan 2017 05:12:56 -0500
Ruga wrote:
> > Probably what's happening is that these are emails over 500 kB
> 500.000 bytes: spamc's default max-size
> 512.000 bytes: spamc's local default max-size
> 005.155 bytes: size of the specific spam
Have you been able to reproduce this by feeding o
On 01/26/2017 01:29 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> SPF_NEUTRAL will NEVER hit SPF_PASS and that's the problem with ?all
>
SPF mechanisms are evaluated in order, and each one has a result type
associated with it. The default result is "+" for "pass". Another type
of result is "?" for "neutral."
Th
Michael Orlitzky skrev den 2017-01-26 19:24:
The OP is looking for a way to whitelist so the "?all" is irrelevant.
Does the sending IP pass the SPF check? If so, whitelist it.
PTR in spf is very hard to forge
treat it as ip4:0.0.0.0/0 -all
yahoo do not want to reject based on spf, but still
On 01/26/2017 12:59 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 26.01.2017 um 18:51 schrieb Michael Orlitzky:
>> On 01/26/2017 12:22 PM, David Jones wrote:
>>> ...
>>> They don't publish a good SPF record so I am not able to add
>>> them to my postwhite list.
>>>
>>
>> Isn't that what their SPF record does
I am running SpamAssassin 3.4.1. It is running as a background daemon,
started with:
/usr/bin/spamd -d --allow-tell
Incoming mail is accepted by postfix 3.1 and submitted via the milter
interface to spamass-milter 0.40 for processing in SpamAssassin.
My Postfix installation is set up to use
On 01/26/2017 12:22 PM, David Jones wrote:
> Anyone know how to get a list of legit mail servers for Yahoo?
> They don't publish a good SPF record so I am not able to add
> them to my postwhite list.
>
> # dig yahoo.com txt +short
> "v=spf1 redirect=_spf.mail.yahoo.com"
> # dig _spf.mail.yahoo.com
Hi,
Has anyone done any work with spamassassin and DLP? We're currently
using the StructuredDataProtection components in clamav, but would
like to do more.
I realize it's probably not something SA would do, but do you use a
milter of some sort with postfix/amavisd to modify the body, such as
for
Anyone know how to get a list of legit mail servers for Yahoo?
They don't publish a good SPF record so I am not able to add
them to my postwhite list.
# dig yahoo.com txt +short
"v=spf1 redirect=_spf.mail.yahoo.com"
# dig _spf.mail.yahoo.com txt +short
"v=spf1 ptr:yahoo.com ptr:yahoo.net ?all"
Th
Thanks Google - many will follow.
https://gsuiteupdates.googleblog.com/2017/01/gmail-will-restrict-js-file-attachments.html
Axb
500.000 bytes: spamc's default max-size
512.000 bytes: spamc's local default max-size
005.155 bytes: size of the specific spam
Original Message
Subject: Re: Ignore third-party SA headers
Local Time: 26 January 2017 2:03 AM
UTC Time: 26 January 2017 01:03
From: rwmailli...
17 matches
Mail list logo