On Thu, 2017-02-02 at 15:23 -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> Anyone else seeing this?
>
Yes - in Fedora 25.
Martin
Anyone else seeing this?
Feb 2 08:10:23 mail mimedefang.pl[13017]: helo: mailman2.scl3.mozilla.com
(63.245.214.181:3844) said "helo mail.mozilla.org"
Feb 2 08:10:23 mail sendmail[14852]: v12FAHm7014852:
from=,
size=4727, class=-30, nrcpts=1,
msgid=<0oudnazy4jgf1g7fnz2dnuu7-qmdn...@mozilla.or
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> mxpf.pm is not part of spamassassin itself but from a random guy on the list
> last year, the original had a bunch of issues and produced warnings from the
> very begin
>
> the attached one contains some serious bugfixes, but i also renam
Le 02/02/2017 à 15:50, RW a écrit :
On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 05:43:24 -0500
Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
...
I will score much higher since it is in the wild. Can you throw a
spample up on pastebin?
Perhaps text/html makes a big difference, but base64 encoded utf-8
text is not uncommon these days - part
I experimented with pyzor and set these in
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf, after installing pyzor
use_pyzor 1
pyzor_path /usr/bin/pyzor
pyzor_options --homedir /etc/spamassassin
I've since commented them out and discontinued the experiment. I
assumed that would be the end of pyzor bei
On 02/02/2017 04:17 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
I experimented with pyzor and set these in
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf, after installing pyzor
use_pyzor 1
pyzor_path /usr/bin/pyzor
pyzor_options --homedir /etc/spamassassin
I've since commented them out and discontinued the experiment.
On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 05:43:24 -0500
Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 2/1/2017 11:30 PM, Pedro David Marco wrote:
> > I did a similar rule to detect it but with higher score (3) since
> > we are seeing a huge LinkedIn Phishing campaign using this
> > technique, that on purpose or by mistake is evading mo
On 2/2/2017 5:43 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 2/1/2017 11:30 PM, Pedro David Marco wrote:
I did a similar rule to detect it but with higher score (3) since we
are seeing a huge LinkedIn Phishing campaign using this technique,
that on purpose or by mistake is evading most SA rules...
I will sc
On 2/1/2017 11:30 PM, Pedro David Marco wrote:
I did a similar rule to detect it but with higher score (3) since we
are seeing a huge LinkedIn Phishing campaign using this technique,
that on purpose or by mistake is evading most SA rules...
I will score much higher since it is in the wild. Can
