On 2017-02-15 16:30, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
> Note that the period that you describe as 'seen by SA a bit later' is
> typically less than a second.
Not in my case. I have a custom Exim configuration where I
intentionally wait for a period of time (currently 4 minutes) between
SMTP acceptance and de
I cannot state strongly enough, that blocking
entire top-level domains these days should come
before RBL. *.top, *.link, *.download, etc.
RBL depends on paid or free.
Paid: Spamhaus, the 800 lb gorilla of RBL.
Also URIBL various feeds. Direct query to a dedicated
address with fresh data FTW.
On 2/14/2017 11:04 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
Given a piece of horrible spam, on which RBL is the sending IP address
likely to appear first?
I want to rationally decide which RBL/s to consult at SMTP time. Afraid
to use all of them, not just due to false positives, but also due to
negative cachin
On 15-02-17 15:19, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> On 2/14/2017 11:04 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
>> Given a piece of horrible spam, on which RBL is the sending IP address
>> likely to appear first?
>>
>> I want to rationally decide which RBL/s to consult at SMTP time. Afraid
>> to use all of them, not just
On 2/14/2017 11:04 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
Given a piece of horrible spam, on which RBL is the sending IP address
likely to appear first?
I want to rationally decide which RBL/s to consult at SMTP time. Afraid
to use all of them, not just due to false positives, but also due to
negative cachin
>From: Ian Zimmerman
>Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 10:04 PM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Fastest listing RBL ?
>Given a piece of horrible spam, on which RBL is the sending IP address
>likely to appear first?
>I want to rationally decide which RBL/s to consult at SMTP time