I actually had no idea SpamAssassin could do bayesian training - I'm an
idiot. Lol. Thank you for pointing that out to me!
On 4/19/2017 2:56 PM, RW wrote:
On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 14:36:24 -0400
W B wrote:
Hey all! I'm having issues with SpamAssassin; it's assigning emails
scores that are way low
On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 14:54:03 -0400
W B wrote:
> You guys are all correct. Somehow I've been overlooking that message
> - I must have misread something. Either way, thank you so much for
> the help; I've set up unbound, so hopefully that should solve the
> issue.
It probably wont. It's a significa
On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 14:36:24 -0400
W B wrote:
> Hey all! I'm having issues with SpamAssassin; it's assigning emails
> scores that are way lower than it should. In addition, the scores
> it's assigning as emails come in are different from the results of
> running SpamAssassin -t on that same email
You guys are all correct. Somehow I've been overlooking that message - I
must have misread something. Either way, thank you so much for the help;
I've set up unbound, so hopefully that should solve the issue.
Sorry, and thank you!
On 4/19/2017 2:48 PM, David Jones wrote:
From: W B
Sent: Wed
>From: W B
>Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2017 1:36 PM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: SpamAssassin scoring issues
>Hey all! I'm having issues with SpamAssassin; it's assigning emails
>scores that are way lower than it should. In addition, the scores it's
>assigning as emails come
W B skrev den 2017-04-19 20:36:
https://www.reddit.com/r/webdev/comments/660n2w/spamassassin_scores_are_oddly_low_different_from/
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
have you readed this and solved it ?
Hey all! I'm having issues with SpamAssassin; it's assigning emails
scores that are way lower than it should. In addition, the scores it's
assigning as emails come in are different from the results of running
SpamAssassin -t on that same email after the fact.
I'd like to avoid posting too much
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi all,
I tried the Ruleset Robert Schetterer suggested but I still get Spam. The rules
barely get a hit. I am pretty sure that the rules are outdated.
I´d also like to avoid excluding Portuguese Mails or Spanish Mails by using
ok_languages bec
Title: Signature
Robert Steinmetz wrote:
Responding to my own post with new information.
I think I've confirmed that the problem is the $PATH, or the perl
equivalent.
I added the full path name where the specific commands were called
and that removed
On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 21:44:27 +0200
Heinrich Boeder wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> thanks for your quick reply. I will give those rules a try.
Only do that if you need to receive ham in Portuguese.
Bayes should learn these very quickly, unless autotraining has been
training then as ham.
You may also
10 matches
Mail list logo
