On 14/09/17 19:59, Loren Wilton wrote:
Should be easy to block. Just block the cron-job.org domain.
As someone else mentioned that address is an obvious joe-job. And
scoring it high doesn't help that much. It worked for the first few
weeks, then they went to contact@ to presumably get
arou
Hm, meant this to go to the list, too. The misdirection is part of why I am so
quiet on the list, which is why I forget the misbehavior, which reinforces the
problem when I reenter the list for a discussion. I gotta mess with my
.procmailrc file to rewrite the headers for SA list emails, I guess
Dianne Skoll skrev den 2017-09-14 20:38:
https://cron-job.org/en/spam-statement/
They are victims of a joe-job.
yes prove that is really is us
if it goes, it goes
On 09/14/2017 01:37 PM, Dianne Skoll wrote:
On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 11:27:27 -0700
"Loren Wilton" wrote:
Other than being obvious spam, they seem to be set up as though they
were legitimate commercial mailing list stuff, often containing
things like contact-id and the like in the links.
Is anyo
Should be easy to block. Just block the cron-job.org domain.
As someone else mentioned that address is an obvious joe-job. And scoring it
high doesn't help that much. It worked for the first few weeks, then they
went to contact@ to presumably get around that. I was
surprised to see in the la
On Thu, 14 Sep 2017, Dianne Skoll wrote:
On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 11:27:27 -0700
"Loren Wilton" wrote:
Other than being obvious spam, they seem to be set up as though they
were legitimate commercial mailing list stuff, often containing
things like contact-id and the like in the links.
Is anyone
Hi, again,
Aha...
https://cron-job.org/en/spam-statement/
They are victims of a joe-job.
Regards,
Dianne.
On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 11:27:27 -0700
"Loren Wilton" wrote:
> Other than being obvious spam, they seem to be set up as though they
> were legitimate commercial mailing list stuff, often containing
> things like contact-id and the like in the links.
> Is anyone else seeing these?
A small number. T
For about a month now I've been getting about 30 spams a day that are all in
the range of 325KB in size. This is all in two bogus style tags. The message
itself is usually just a few links, very offten to proffbuilder.com. The
from address is always a random name, but the email address is very o
Robert Kudyba skrev den 2017-09-14 16:18:
A few less now, so these are ok to ignore?
Sep 14 10:15:48.607 [21681] dbg: config: warning: SCORE SET FOR
NON-EXISTENT RULE DNS_FROM_RFC_BOGUSMX
search for RFC and remove rules
I'll check but nothing jummps out as an issue. Ping me next Wednesday.
On 9/14/2017 10:18 AM, Robert Kudyba wrote:
A few less now, so these are ok to ignore?
spamassassin -D --lint 2>&1 | grep -Ei '(failed|undefined
dependency|score set for non-existent rule)'
Sep 14 10:15:48.606 [21681] dbg:
A few less now, so these are ok to ignore?
spamassassin -D --lint 2>&1 | grep -Ei '(failed|undefined dependency|score set
for non-existent rule)'
Sep 14 10:15:48.606 [21681] dbg: config: warning: score set for non-existent
rule DNS_FROM_RFC_DSN
Sep 14 10:15:48.606 [21681] dbg: config: warning: s
grab https://www.pccc.com/downloads/SpamAssassin/contrib/nonKAMrules.cf
as well.
After that let me know but some rules are internal use only so if it's a
warning, don't be too concerned.
Regards,
KAM
On 9/14/2017 9:57 AM, Robert Kudyba wrote:
> i have lost the url for kam.cf :(
https://urld
> > i have lost the url for kam.cf :(
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.pccc.com_downloads_SpamAssassin_contrib_KAM.cf&d=DwIDaQ&c=aqMfXOEvEJQh2iQMCb7Wy8l0sPnURkcqADc2guUW8IM&r=X0jL9y0sL4r4iU_qVtR3lLNo4tOL1ry_m7-psV3GejY&m=2_KMc6f7_uK5u9lGUOjxcShbX6TXhm_XZ-6Rqk8esj4&s=RD7
On Wed, 2017-09-13 at 20:36 -0400, Alex wrote:
> I understood that without the password the document would not be
> visible, not just that it couldn't be changed.
>
Thats my understanding too. I've always been unable to see a password
protected PDF until I supply the password: all you see when at
15 matches
Mail list logo
