On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 21:15 -0600, David Jones wrote:
> On 01/30/2018 08:04 PM, Chris wrote:
> >
> > Yesterday there were no issues with my once a day update. Today it
> > exited with a code 4. Here is the output:
> >
> > https://pastebin.com/aXvk0QQu
> >
> > Any ideas on what seems to be the
On 01/30/2018 08:04 PM, Chris wrote:
Yesterday there were no issues with my once a day update. Today it
exited with a code 4. Here is the output:
https://pastebin.com/aXvk0QQu
Any ideas on what seems to be the problem?
Chris
rules: failed to run FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD test, skipping:
Yesterday there were no issues with my once a day update. Today it
exited with a code 4. Here is the output:
https://pastebin.com/aXvk0QQu
Any ideas on what seems to be the problem?
Chris
--
Chris
KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C
31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092 ft)
20:02:58 up 2:46, 1 user, load
On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 20:55 +0100, Daniele Duca wrote:
> It looks like apparmor is preventing clamav to create it's temporary
> files.
>
> Two solutions, disable apparmor or fix the config file in
> /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.clamd
>
> Daniele
>
Thanks Daniele, it worked after I changed the tmp
It looks like apparmor is preventing clamav to create it's temporary files.
Two solutions, disable apparmor or fix the config file in
/etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.clamd
Daniele
On 30/01/2018 17:50, Chris wrote:
I'm seeing this - https://pastebin.com/86s7cVBj and I'm not sure if
it's an SA
Thank you,
Yes, DCC Razor and Pyzor are installed and running.
I will look into your other suggestions and let you know.
On 1/30/18 1:37 PM, David Jones wrote:
On 01/30/2018 11:47 AM, Computer Bob wrote:
Also:
I modified the following SA local.cf items:
On 01/30/2018 11:47 AM, Computer Bob wrote:
Also:
I modified the following SA local.cf items:
---
# Add *SPAM* to the Subject header of spam e-mails
#
rewrite_header Subject
Also:
I modified the following SA local.cf items:
---
# Add *SPAM* to the Subject header of spam e-mails
#
rewrite_header Subject *SPAM* < Uncommented
# Use Bayesian
Follow-up,
I did a dist-upgrade to Ubuntu 16.04 LTS and the process whacked the SA bad.
Removal and purging of SA was necessary and a fresh reinstall brought it
back.
It is currently "factory fresh".
Still my problems persist, I am pursuing this via the Amavis mail list
as command line calls
I'm seeing this - https://pastebin.com/86s7cVBj and I'm not sure if
it's an SA issue or a ClamAV issue.
apt-cache policy clamav
clamav:
Installed: 0.99.3-0ubuntu1~chris+1
Candidate: 0.99.3-0ubuntu1~chris+1
apt-cache policy spamassassin
spamassassin:
Installed: 3.4.1-3
Candidate: 3.4.1-3
On 01/30/2018 07:22 AM, David Jones wrote:
On 01/30/2018 06:46 AM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
Just spotted by others,
this diff fixes the problem:
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7540
Btw:
what's the state of 3.4.2+? Beta? Release?
from: http://spamassassin.apache.org/:
Latest
On 1/30/2018 4:11 AM, Marcin Mirosław wrote:
Can error pasted below be related to this commit?
Yes, without a doubt the same bug.
Kevin A. McGrail skrev den 2018-01-30 14:17:
On 1/30/2018 5:53 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
on cpan i see Mail::DMARC so only sa plugin is still missing
I thought that plugin might be a good GSOC 2018 idea.
yep
On 01/30/2018 06:46 AM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
Just spotted by others,
this diff fixes the problem:
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7540
Btw:
what's the state of 3.4.2+? Beta? Release?
from: http://spamassassin.apache.org/:
Latest News | 2015-04-30: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 has been
On 1/30/2018 7:46 AM, Alex wrote:
Now I see this check_for_forged_gmail_received_headers function was
just added to the 3.4 branch in the last few days.
Yes, whoever added the rule needs to be more careful. Not saying names
(or initials :-) ).
Regards,
KAM
On 1/30/2018 5:53 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
on cpan i see Mail::DMARC so only sa plugin is still missing
I thought that plugin might be a good GSOC 2018 idea.
Hi,
>> Just spotted by others,
>> this diff fixes the problem:
>> https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7540
>
>> Btw:
>> what's the state of 3.4.2+? Beta? Release?
>>
>> from: http://spamassassin.apache.org/:
>> Latest News | 2015-04-30: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 has been released!
>>
>> I
Hello Giovanni,
On 01/30/2018 12:55 PM, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> On 01/30/18 12:43, A. Schulze wrote:
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> shortly (since around 09:30 UTC) I get such notifications on sa-update:
>>
>> rules: failed to run FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD test, skipping:
>> (Can't locate object method
Hi,
> Just spotted by others,
> this diff fixes the problem:
> https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7540
> Btw:
> what's the state of 3.4.2+? Beta? Release?
>
> from: http://spamassassin.apache.org/:
> Latest News | 2015-04-30: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 has been released!
>
> I didn't
Giovanni Bechis:
Just spotted by others,
this diff fixes the problem:
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7540
yea! but that's a patch for the rules, right?
may we expect a fixed ruleset will be published shortly?
Andreas
Btw:
what's the state of 3.4.2+? Beta? Release?
On 01/30/18 12:43, A. Schulze wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> shortly (since around 09:30 UTC) I get such notifications on sa-update:
>
> rules: failed to run FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD test, skipping:
> (Can't locate object method "check_for_forged_gmail_received_headers" via
> package
Hello all,
shortly (since around 09:30 UTC) I get such notifications on sa-update:
rules: failed to run FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD test, skipping:
(Can't locate object method "check_for_forged_gmail_received_headers"
via package "Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus" at (eval 1277) line 253.
)
channel:
Jonathan Sélea skrev den 2018-01-30 11:04:
I am fully aware that ARC is still in draft.
let it stay there :=)
but opendmarc will handle arc results in later versions
so to speak about spamassassin we begin to need dmarc supported in perl
on cpan i see Mail::DMARC so only sa plugin is still
Hi,
I am unable to find information online regarding SpamAssassin and ARC
(Authenticated Recieved Chain, http://arc-spec.org and
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authenticated_Received_Chain)
but is SpamAssassin takin the ARC-headers into consideration when it
performs its DKIM and SPF check? Or is
On 01/30/18 10:11, Marcin Mirosław wrote:
> W dniu 29.01.2018 o 08:26, Giovanni Bechis pisze:
>> On 01/29/18 06:00, Alex wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2 (hotmail.com 'From' address, but no 'Received:')
triggers for valid hotmail messages... (SA 3.4.1)
This small change
W dniu 29.01.2018 o 08:26, Giovanni Bechis pisze:
> On 01/29/18 06:00, Alex wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2 (hotmail.com 'From' address, but no 'Received:')
>>> triggers for valid hotmail messages... (SA 3.4.1)
>>>
>>> This small change solves the problem but i do not know whether it is
26 matches
Mail list logo
