You can likely just disable Geo::IP anyway. See
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6824
On 3/2/2018 1:06 AM, Maurizio Caloro wrote:
Hello together
I have little Geo::IP Trouble
Yesterday i have upgraded Spamassassin to 3.4.1 on debian_version 8.10
3.16.51-3+deb8u1
If i s
Hello together
I have little Geo::IP Trouble
Yesterday i have upgraded Spamassassin to 3.4.1 on debian_version 8.10
3.16.51-3+deb8u1
If i start me service this GeiIP Plugin have some error messages
Mar 02 06:44:15 Servername spamd[22306]: plugin: failed to parse plugin
(from @INC): Can't
On 3/1/18 3:58 PM, Luis E. Muñoz wrote:
On 1 Mar 2018, at 11:54, Miles Fidelman wrote:
[...] and sometimes turn on VERP to narrow things down to an
individual. It's all made so much worse by morons who confuse the
"spam" button with their "delete" key when using webmail from a big
provider. S
On Thu, 1 Mar 2018, John Hardin wrote:
A bunch of Javascript to display a *single image*? And it doesn't display
*any content at all* if javascript is disabled for that site?
That's what I hate about the web these days, there's too much crap
surrounding the useful content.
"too much -vulne
On 1 Mar 2018, at 11:54, Miles Fidelman wrote:
[...] and sometimes turn on VERP to narrow things down to an
individual. It's all made so much worse by morons who confuse the
"spam" button with their "delete" key when using webmail from a big
provider. Sigh...)
Out of curiosity, why turn off V
On Thu, 1 Mar 2018, Charles Sprickman wrote:
(OT)
I used to be much more angry at the “send to spam” clickers on AOL webmail, but
if you look at the UI, it’s really AOL’s fault. It’s terrible, and you can
make it better by changing some default settings in their webmail, but most
people are
On 3/1/18 3:02 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Mar 1, 2018, at 2:54 PM, Miles Fidelman
mailto:mfidel...@meetinghouse.net>> wrote:
On 3/1/18 2:45 PM, David Jones wrote:
On 03/01/2018 01:01 PM, Kevin Viner wrote:
The following text is not SA "advice" nor report.
You should start by consu
> On Mar 1, 2018, at 2:54 PM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
>
> On 3/1/18 2:45 PM, David Jones wrote:
>
>> On 03/01/2018 01:01 PM, Kevin Viner wrote:
>>>
The following text is not SA "advice" nor report.
You should start by consulting who / what gave that text in response to
get d
On 3/1/18 2:45 PM, David Jones wrote:
On 03/01/2018 01:01 PM, Kevin Viner wrote:
The following text is not SA "advice" nor report.
You should start by consulting who / what gave that text in response to
get details.
Thank you. I did, and they said that they can't give me any more
informati
On 1 Mar 2018, at 10:29, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
I know I have brought up this issue on this list before, and sorry for
the persistence, but having 7 different rules adding scores for the
IADB whitelist still seems either ridiculous, or outright suspect:
(Disclaimer, I have inner visibility in
On 03/01/2018 12:29 PM, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
I know I have brought up this issue on this list before, and sorry for
the persistence, but having 7 different rules adding scores for the IADB
whitelist still seems either ridiculous, or outright suspect:
-0.2 RCVD_IN_IADB_RDNS RBL: IADB: Se
>
> On Thu, 1 Mar 2018, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
>
>> I know I have brought up this issue on this list before, and sorry for the
>> persistence, but having 7 different rules adding scores for the IADB
>> whitelist still seems either ridiculous, or outright suspect:
>>
>> -0.2 RCVD_IN_IADB_RDN
On 03/01/2018 01:01 PM, Kevin Viner wrote:
The following text is not SA "advice" nor report.
You should start by consulting who / what gave that text in response to
get details.
Thank you. I did, and they said that they can't give me any more
information. As I explained to them, I'm a profes
On Thu, 1 Mar 2018, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
I know I have brought up this issue on this list before, and sorry for the
persistence, but having 7 different rules adding scores for the IADB
whitelist still seems either ridiculous, or outright suspect:
-0.2 RCVD_IN_IADB_RDNS RBL: IADB: Sende
> The following text is not SA "advice" nor report.
>
> You should start by consulting who / what gave that text in response to
> get details.
Thank you. I did, and they said that they can't give me any more
information. As I explained to them, I'm a professional entertainer with a
mailing list
I know I have brought up this issue on this list before, and sorry for
the persistence, but having 7 different rules adding scores for the IADB
whitelist still seems either ridiculous, or outright suspect:
-0.2 RCVD_IN_IADB_RDNS RBL: IADB: Sender has reverse DNS record
On 28 Feb 2018, at 16:13 (-0500), RW wrote:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 21:01:36 +0100
Benny Pedersen wrote:
how do one make multiline grep of add-header line, this is imho
triggy since it on long lines continue on next line with a first char
space, if one could help me solve it i be thankfull
If yo
17 matches
Mail list logo
