I stand corrected!
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018, 13:22 RW wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Apr 2018 19:56:13 -0400
> Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>
> > It's pedantic but I am 99.9% sure that a Test Rule (prefix T_) is
> > scored at 0.001 but scores in the report are rounded to a ceiling so
> >
On Thu, 5 Apr 2018 19:56:13 -0400
Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> It's pedantic but I am 99.9% sure that a Test Rule (prefix T_) is
> scored at 0.001 but scores in the report are rounded to a ceiling so
> it displaces as .01.
>
Informational rules that do score 0.001 display as 0.00 whereas T_*
rules
On 04/07/2018 10:42 AM, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
I'm not entirely sure what is the cause of this - notification emails
from The Pension Regulator in UK (a government body overseeing pensions)
have the destination email in upper case as part of the Message-ID. I
don't know if the user has input
On 07/04/18 21:20, Bill Cole wrote:
On 7 Apr 2018, at 11:42 (-0400), Sebastian Arcus wrote:
Do the standards really require a message id to be in all lower case?
Of course not, and that's also not an accurate description of
MSGID_SPAM_CAPS.
A small minority of rules in SA are based on
On 07/04/18 17:22, Antony Stone wrote:
On Saturday 07 April 2018 at 18:10:18, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
On 07/04/18 16:52, Reindl Harald wrote something.
Thank you for answering, but really, in effect you haven't answered at
all my question.
And the way I customise the scores are based on
On 07/04/18 17:14, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 07.04.2018 um 18:10 schrieb Sebastian Arcus:
And the way I customise the scores are based on the type of emails
received at this particular site. It might seem "idiotic" to you, but
there are reasons for those scores. Not everyone receives the same