On 13 Jul 2018, at 14:49, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
A little survey on your local policies...
What do you do when a subject line is longer than 78 characters?
A. Reject
B. Accept as spam
C. Accept
Accept, absent some actual spam sign.
Note that the 78-character recommendation is not
Longer than 300 characters gets spam points.
Longer than 78 is technically allowed so long as the raw message has it
broken into continuation lines. We arbitrarily decided that 300 characters
indicates either the ravings of a lunatic or the output of spamware, and
it's been accurate. Most
On Fri, 13 Jul 2018, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
A little survey on your local policies...
What do you do when a subject line is longer than 78 characters?
A. Reject
B. Accept as spam
C. Accept
That clause for 78 chars is a "SHOULD", the "MUST" is for 998 chars.
It then also says:
Accept. Mail must flow and it's not a spam indicator.
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018, 14:49 Rupert Gallagher wrote:
> A little survey on your local policies...
>
> What do you do when a subject line is longer than 78 characters?
>
> A. Reject
> B. Accept as spam
> C. Accept
>
A little survey on your local policies...
What do you do when a subject line is longer than 78 characters?
A. Reject
B. Accept as spam
C. Accept
We got a few hits on RCVD_IN_PBL for the IP 24.137.53.2 that do not
appear to be listed on spamhaus. I tried
dig 2.53.137.24.zen.spamhaus.org
on that same server and got no results, and even then SA kept hitting
that rule. My understanding of /eval:check_rbl('zen-lastexternal',
