Re: Autolearn HAM with spamscore 996

2019-10-22 Thread John Hardin
On Tue, 22 Oct 2019, RW wrote: If you are in a position to train manually, I think it's best to turn-off auto-learning. +1 Auto-learn is primarily for large sites with a diverse user base (e.g. an ISP). -- John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/

Re: Autolearn HAM with spamscore 996

2019-10-22 Thread RW
On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 18:31:18 +0200 Philipp Ewald wrote: > First thanks for help, i will train them with current mail. > > my Amavis configuration found my Attachment and score this with SPAM > score 999 but auto learn ignore this > ... > did i miss something? can someone help me? > >

Autolearn HAM with spamscore 996

2019-10-22 Thread Philipp Ewald
First thanks for help, i will train them with current mail. my Amavis configuration found my Attachment and score this with SPAM score 999 but auto learn ignore this X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Score: 996.7 X-Spam-Level:

use of razor/pyzor/dcc on not english messages

2019-10-22 Thread hg user
Hi, I'm wondering if the plugins listed in the subject may help with messages that are not in english...

Re: Question about Bayes implementation

2019-10-22 Thread RW
On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 12:21:45 +0200 Philipp Ewald wrote: > Hi folks, > > at this point i split all my SPAM mail to get the attachment to > create a hash table. (but this is not my point) > > Its also possible to split my SPAM into html/text, plain/text and > headers to. > Debian package:

Question about Bayes implementation

2019-10-22 Thread Philipp Ewald
Hi folks, at this point i split all my SPAM mail to get the attachment to create a hash table. (but this is not my point) Its also possible to split my SPAM into html/text, plain/text and headers to. Debian package: ripmime Now i ask myself: If i learn spamassassin with my mails should i