Re: spf fail !

2020-07-18 Thread Benny Pedersen
Noel Butler skrev den 2020-07-19 04:12: you'll find other mail rejected as well, since someone changed from hermes to this mailroute machine... X-Spam-Rules_score: HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001,HTML_MESSAGE=0.1, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-10.1,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.1,SPF_FAIL=6.419,

Re: spf fail !

2020-07-18 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 7/18/2020 10:12 PM, Noel Butler wrote: > > On 19/07/2020 10:45, Benny Pedersen wrote: > >> Received: from mailroute1-lw-us.apache.org >> (mailroute1-lw-us.apache.org [207.244.88.153]) >> by mx.junc.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPS >> for > >; Sun, 19 Jul 2020 00:41:16 + 

Re: spf fail !

2020-07-18 Thread Noel Butler
On 19/07/2020 10:45, Benny Pedersen wrote: > Received: from mailroute1-lw-us.apache.org (mailroute1-lw-us.apache.org > [207.244.88.153]) > by mx.junc.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPS > for ; Sun, 19 Jul 2020 00:41:16 + (UTC) > > gives spf fails now, be carefull you'll find other mail rejected as we

spf fail !

2020-07-18 Thread Benny Pedersen
Received: from mailroute1-lw-us.apache.org (mailroute1-lw-us.apache.org [207.244.88.153]) by mx.junc.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Sun, 19 Jul 2020 00:41:16 + (UTC) gives spf fails now, be carefull

Re: sa-update for versions 3.4.2 and older fail lint because of description on non-existent rule was Re: update fail

2020-07-18 Thread Benny Pedersen
Kevin A. McGrail skrev den 2020-07-18 23:32: Great, thanks for the update. With this change we also know how to best prevent similar issues. more nutella :=)

Re: sa-update for versions 3.4.2 and older fail lint because of description on non-existent rule was Re: update fail

2020-07-18 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
Great, thanks for the update. With this change we also know how to best prevent similar issues. Regards, KAM -- Kevin A. McGrail Member, Apache Software Foundation Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171 On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 4:59 PM Marc

Re: sa-update for versions 3.4.2 and older fail lint because of description on non-existent rule was Re: update fail

2020-07-18 Thread Marcus Schopen
Am Donnerstag, den 16.07.2020, 17:43 -0400 schrieb Kevin A. McGrail: > Agreed. 1879851 is after I submitted the fix but doesn;t include the > fix. I will have to check again after the next rule publishing. > Sorry for the false alarm. Feedback: sa-update without errors now. Thanks a lot! Cheer

Re: update fail

2020-07-18 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
Are you using 3.4.2 or older? And these were tested but the warnings only affect older versions. -- Kevin A. McGrail Member, Apache Software Foundation Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171 On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 6:54 AM Reindl Harald wro