On Fri, 2020-12-11 at 12:45 +1300, Sidney Markowitz wrote:
> 2. Using the rpm command to install a local rpm file does not
> automatically install dependencies from a repo. Always use yum (or dnf
> in newer CentOS or in Fedora) instead of the now old rpm program.
>
Minor correction: the rpm
Niamh Holding wrote on 10/12/20 12:01 am:
rpm -ivh spamassassin-3.4.4-1.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
perl(BSD::Resource) is needed by spamassassin-3.4.4-1.el7.centos.x86_64
perl(Net::CIDR::Lite) is needed by
spamassassin-3.4.4-1.el7.centos.x86_64
1. The
Hi!
I use spamassassin 3.4.4 and I try txrep. When I run sa-learn --spam
it put six tuples to database (postgres):
# select * from txrep ;
username | email |
ip | msgcount | totscore | signedby | last_hit
On Thu, 10 Dec 2020, Benoit Branciard wrote:
Have there been any changes to the __PDS_FROM_2_EMAILS rule recently on
3.004002 branch ?
Yes. I took another look at it prompted by the recent many-froms
discussion and did a little tuning.
Since latest update this night, we got significantly
On 10 Dec 2020, at 1:18, Andrew Colin Kissa wrote:
>> On 09 Dec 2020, at 21:13, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>>
>> thanks for reporting, but this should be added to centos bug tracker since
>> its a centos problem, not a spamassassin problem to solve, this 2 modules is
>> only optional
>
> There is
On 10 Dec 2020, at 5:25, Benoit Branciard wrote:
Have there been any changes to the __PDS_FROM_2_EMAILS rule recently
on 3.004002 branch ?
SIDE NOTE: The default ruleset in only present on the "trunk" branch.
Version dependencies within the ruleset are handled by conditional
structures
Andrew Colin Kissa skrev den 2020-12-10 07:18:
There is no bug here to be reported, those packages do exist in CentOS7
yum whatprovides "perl(BSD::Resource)"
yum whatprovides "perl(Net::CIDR::Lite)"
maintainer on centos could force install them as hard dependice, but as
i say its optional
Sorry for the garbage in the signature from my $work email..
There seems to have been -
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/jhardin/20_misc_testing.cf?r1=1884188=1884215_format=h
Whilst this has my initials, it's actually in John's sandbox - I think this was
a rule I submitted on the mailing list many moons ago.
The
Hello,
Have there been any changes to the __PDS_FROM_2_EMAILS rule recently on
3.004002 branch ?
Since latest update this night, we got significantly more matches of
meta rule PDS_FROM_2_EMAILS than previously, and for at least a dozen of
them, the rule triggered despite the fact that both
> On 09 Dec 2020, at 21:13, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
> thanks for reporting, but this should be added to centos bug tracker since
> its a centos problem, not a spamassassin problem to solve, this 2 modules is
> only optional
There is no bug here to be reported, those packages do exist in
11 matches
Mail list logo
