I don't think it's reasonable but an FP in Pyzor is leading to other
rule hits.
Was the overall email marked as spam?
On 9/24/2021 12:21 AM, Jared Hall wrote:
On 9/23/2021 10:07 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Jared, looks to me like an FP in Pyzor.
No doubt. The 4.608 points for a single
On 9/24/2021 12:30 PM, Grant Taylor wrote:
On 9/24/21 10:17 AM, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
This is a good case study of interpretation, subjectivity, and why there
can only be one Artificial Super Intelligence.
Put two ASIs in a room and their cores would meltdown arguing over
whether to use
On 9/24/21 10:17 AM, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
The RFC 5322 as cited is concerned about domains and their internet
address, where the sender's address needs to be resolvable through DNS
by the recipient.
"where the sender's address" seems to be discussing the email address,
which is completely
Anyway, this part of the original RFC 822 reads loud and clear on the matter.
Each new RFC aiming to improve it seems the result of spamming lobbies aiming
at hiding themselves. The latest grammar for MIDs is horrible.
Original Message
On Sep 24, 2021, 18:17, Rupert Gallagher
The RFC 5322 as cited is concerned about domains and their internet address,
where the sender's address needs to be resolvable through DNS by the recipient.
If the email infrastructure serves local messages in a company, then LAN
addresses get the job done. But delivering messages across
Hi,
> We use fuglu in production at work and it works very nicely. But it was
> on a centos machine. I have it too on a debian raspberry pi and just
> updated from gitlab. I had a domainmagic dependency missing too but
> mentionned it to a dev, who's working on a fix. I have no experience
> with
Hi Benny,
We use fuglu in production at work and it works very nicely. But it was
on a centos machine. I have it too on a debian raspberry pi and just
updated from gitlab. I had a domainmagic dependency missing too but
mentionned it to a dev, who's working on a fix. I have no experience
with
