On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 10:33:21AM -0500, Dave Funk wrote:
> In SA 3.4.1 the host value of From:addr was automagically added to the
> URIHOSTS list and thus exposed to URIBL lookups.
I don't think so. Maybe you had some plugin.
In SA 3.4.1 the host value of From:addr was automagically added to the URIHOSTS
list and thus exposed to URIBL lookups.
SA 3.4.6 does not do that. Is there a configuration option to reactivate that
feature?
Thanks,
Dave
--
Dave Funk University of Iowa
Colle
On 18/10/2021 11:20 am, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
spamd by default tries to find recipients' home directories and user
preferences in them. try passing following option to spamd:
-x, --nouser-config, --user-config
On 18.10.21 14:47, Linkcheck wrote:
Thanks. Where would I actually ad
On Mon, 18 Oct 2021, Linkcheck wrote:
On 18/10/2021 11:20 am, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
spamd by default tries to find recipients' home directories and user
preferences in them. try passing following option to spamd:
instruct spamd to connect to 127.0.0.1
Sorry, I'm not sure where to do
On Mon, 18 Oct 2021, Linkcheck wrote:
On 18/10/2021 11:20 am, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
spamd by default tries to find recipients' home directories and user
preferences in them. try passing following option to spamd:
-x, --nouser-config, --user-config
Thanks. Where would I actuall
Linkcheck writes:
>> instruct spamd to connect to 127.0.0.1
>
> Sorry, I'm not sure where to do that. I've tried as noted in the OP; I
> can't find anywhere else (remembering I've dropped spamfilter.sh).
I'm fuzzy on the details but hope this helps.
What's going on is basically
spamd might
On 18/10/2021 11:20 am, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
spamd by default tries to find recipients' home directories and user
preferences in them. try passing following option to spamd:
-x, --nouser-config, --user-config
Thanks. Where would I actually add that? Which file / command?
> -H
The problem with browsing online for an answer is that everyone seems to
have a different solution. Obviously, I've managed to combine two
solutions. Thanks for the pointer!
I've tried both types independantly now and opted for the milter, since
the other one does not use any of my own regex f
On 18.10.21 10:53, Linkcheck wrote:
I am setting up a new postfix/dovecot/spamassassin server to replace
an outdated one. It works correctly but I have two outstanding
warnings in the logs that I would like to eliminate if possible. I
have trawled through dozens of postings online but found no
One thing that needs clarification is how you want to integrate spam
filtering with SpamAssassin with Postfix:
Apparently, you are trying to do this with two different methods at
once? Once with spamass-milter, which is a milter that uses spamc to
integrate SpamAssassin with Postfix. And once with
I am setting up a new postfix/dovecot/spamassassin server to replace an
outdated one. It works correctly but I have two outstanding warnings in
the logs that I would like to eliminate if possible. I have trawled
through dozens of postings online but found no resolution for either
warning. The s
11 matches
Mail list logo